- Joined
- 22 Aug 2006
- Messages
- 7,067
- Reaction score
- 1,187
- Country

If you have a point, as usual it's buried behind sentences which.... aren't sentences, or refer to something irrelevant or obvious, or "mysterious".Really? Did you know that RM have been delivering smaller amazon parcels on foot? Didn't seem to last long or maybe I don't receive enough to know if it's continuing.
What a lot if the dispute is about concerns gig economy concepts as Amazon use.
Everything RM delivers, is on foot for part of its journey. Why should their Amazon deliveries be different?
Amazon has nothing to do with the competence of the interviewer.
The PO man could have adequately answered the twit's question with responses such as:
"No that's not true".
"I'm not responsible, even slightly, for that. I have no input so why TF are you asking me?".
"No, you made that up".
"That's a dumb question. As you don't appear to have a clue, I'll explain how it works....". To which the interviewer would have accused that the PO man wasn't answering the question - which was dumb.
"Ask the person who said what you say they said. How should I know?".
"You're accusing me of dishonesty, without a shred of evidence. I'll be communicating with your superiors".
I pity the twit's constituents.