Is it just me

My son, I was proud of, when he passed his RAE and got his amateur radio licence at 14, I am sure his teacher knew he had passed it, so one would have thought he would have been wary. However, my son comes home laughing at his teacher, who had said there were two types of transistor could anyone name them? Son answered bipolar and field effect, and was told wrong, it was PNP and NPN.

Teachers, are themselves, only taught just enough to be able to teach what they teach. They so rarely have any real, deep understanding of what they are teaching, or how things actually work. I did the RAE course, not because needed it, but to ensure I wouldn't be caught out by the exam. There were numerous points, were the lecturer was expressing wrong information, and I took him to task over, lugging a copy of the RSGB manual in, but I was wasting my time. One point he was confusing, was the working/design différance, between a 'noise blanker', and a 'noise limiter'. His information suggested they were one and the same thing.
 
The problem is often teachers have never had a job which needs their training, so any errors in the training they are unaware of, and the syllabus often changes, without them being retrained. We have allied trades, where both trades do some of the same work, the same happens with teachers, my last physics course was taught by a chemist, and in the main he had the knowledge, but he did lack some of the electrical knowledge.

But secondary school is a limited time, and there is a limit at what can be taught in the time. So I was never taught how to use a computer at school, not even a calculator, so if that is taught, something else has to be missed, some things can be dropped, how to use knotts or castles log tables for example, but I was not taught boolean logic at school.

I did need to do 'games' and got in trouble when found playing chess in the game's lesson, I was just as pedantic back then. I really could not work out why I had to learn to throw a javelin? Or how to kick a ball, or hit one with a stick, or bat, seemed a waste of time, I would never have a job needing those skills.

So most of us at 16 specialised in some subject, be it an apprenticeship, collage, university, or some other vocation, and in the main by 21 we were trained, the apprenticeship had been shortened to just 5 years, it was 7 in my dad's day, but he left school at 14, so 2 extra years in school, meant 2 less years training for one's job, with my children it was 18, so apprenticeship reduced to 3 years, and to cram in the knowledge is less time, we also spent more and more time in collage and gone was the journeyman.

Collage courses assumed one had some background knowledge, how to use log tables for example, but this background knowledge can be lacking, and when I went to University I was given an exam to find out if I had the background knowledge. And I thought knowing logs, was how to use log tables, or a slide rule, oh was my maths lacking.

But some of the bits we were taught have changed, it was red to red, yellow to yellow and blue to bits. Does not work with grey to bits. I was taught L was for live, now L is for line, and both line and neutral are live, any wonder people get confused, and red is for danger, so if you see danger you press the red button not the green! How did that happen. If for personal safety a switch or relay is yellow or red, seems good, until someone does not follow the rules, and uses a black one.
 
But secondary school is a limited time, and there is a limit at what can be taught in the time. So I was never taught how to use a computer at school, not even a calculator, so if that is taught, something else has to be missed, some things can be dropped, how to use knotts or castles log tables for example, but I was not taught boolean logic at school.

No such thing as computers, when I was at school - it was all valves, until transistors appeared. I got myself interested in electronics, after school, then when the very early computers came along, they really grabbed my interest. It cost me many thousands.

I did need to do 'games' and got in trouble when found playing chess in the game's lesson, I was just as pedantic back then. I really could not work out why I had to learn to throw a javelin? Or how to kick a ball, or hit one with a stick, or bat, seemed a waste of time, I would never have a job needing those skills.

I wasn't athletic, at all. Whilst in secondary school, at the local library, I happened across a book on chess, it caught my interest, and I began in earnest studying it. Next thing, I was teaching lots of others at school, to play. We would end up playing during the break times.
 
Teachers, are themselves, only taught just enough to be able to teach what they teach.
In general academic terms, that's not quite true. As far as I am aware, it has always been the case that teachers are expected to be 'qualified' to at least one 'level' higher than they will be teaching - i.e. that O-Level teachers had to have at least an A-Level in the subject concerned, A-Level teachers had to have at least a first degree, teachers of undergraduates had to have a 'higher degree' etc.

It's obviously a bit different with things like the RAE, since there is no direct 'higher level qualification' that could be asked for.
 
It just happened it was teacher / parent night that night. And I was told by his teacher how Mark my son when getting a question wrong in the class had just burst out laughing. I told him Mark had already told me, and all it needed was for the teacher to apologise, Mark did realise school text books may not give the full answer
If my son burst out laughing at a teacher, it would not be the teacher apologising. Do you never make a mistake? If you did, would you be happy being laughed at? It's called respect.
 
If my son burst out laughing at a teacher, it would not be the teacher apologising. Do you never make a mistake? If you did, would you be happy being laughed at? It's called respect.
I think 'it depends'.

As you say, we all make mistakes, but some are so 'funny' that it's hard to avoid 'bursting out in laughter' in response - and without intending any disrespect. Indeed, one might hope that when someone has made a 'funny' mistake, they would also burst out laughing when it was brought to their attention :-)
 
If my son burst out laughing at a teacher, it would not be the teacher apologising. Do you never make a mistake? If you did, would you be happy being laughed at? It's called respect.
Well, one of our science teachers insisted Volts = Watts * Ohms (it may have been a different error) and yes we did laugh as we'd already learnt the corner of the page paper triangles method.
 

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Back
Top