Teachers educate children to get results.
They do nowadays, perhaps that's part of the problem.
Education is a statistics driven machine.
It is nowadays, perhaps that's part of the problem.
Teachers educate children to get results.
Education is a statistics driven machine.
It's a multifaceted problem, which is why it is so hard to fix, and impossible with a one policy approach. Throwing money at just the police, or just schools, or just youth centres, won't make much of a difference. Communities need to work together
Definitely. Especially when you have Heads deliberately massaging the figures. However, exclusions come with their own bureaucratic headache and are not taken lightly. Schools don't expel students just because they underperform or make the stats look bad.It is nowadays, perhaps that's part of the problem.
There is a lack of support in social services, so difficult children end up being dealt with by the school or the police.Definitely. Especially when you have Heads deliberately massaging the figures. However, exclusions come with their own bureaucratic headache and are not taken lightly. Schools don't expel students just because they underperform or make the stats look bad.
Not in a majority of cases no. Some are given a chance at another local school if the DIP approves. Otherwise it is referred to the PRU.exclusion from school puts them on the streets
`I agree. The point I was making is that schools don't automatically seek to permanently exclude a pupil. It is a last resort and one that costs a lot of money and resources. It's wrong to say that schools would always seek to permanently exclude on a whim or to make the figures look good.But as mentioned before, PRU is a well-known recruitment ground for gangs now.
School exclusions 'fuelling gang violence'
Cuts to Police.
Cut to Social Services.
Cuts to Youth centres.
Who shall we blame? Anyone but the people making the cuts. Yet RWR like to call a spade a spade.
Tell an RWR thanks for your quote and I want to take you on but slash 25%. I wonder if he will come running or tell me to do one.
Perhaps you're right, and cutting police budgets, and cutting 21 thousand experienced officers, didn't do any damage to the police service.
Or perhaps you're wrong, and it did.
Have you written to Prime Minister Johnson telling him he shouldn't reverse some of the cuts made by his predecessor?
Adding 21000 more police would make a difference, but not a significant one, if they have the same (lack of ) powers as now.
youth services, rehabilitation in prisons, .
When people say "Policing has failed in this country" that really worries me - people are blaming the service providers, and often blaming the wrong ones, for rising crime, rather than blaming the fact that we as a country have decided not to fund the services that are proven to reduce crime.
They all come under the heading of "Being Nice to Criminals"
The purpose of school exclusion is not to help the child.
Nor to help the parents
Nor to help society