Labour thug jailed.

[Highway Man]

Judging by your posts, you know very little about the constitution and statutory instruments

But hey at least you tried, nevermind eh back to the drawing board

come on then, lets hear it. This should be good.

 

[MNW67]

Are you saying, you’ve never heard of the bill of rights 1869?

Magna Carta 1215
Bill of rights 1869

I am assuming this was a spellchecker gone rogue. But just for the sake of clarity, the Bill of Rights was 1689.

 

[noseall]

And then race down a public street with said very heavy object threatening further violence?

...is not a lawful excuse.

 

[noseall]

I am assuming this was a spellchecker gone rogue. But just for the sake of clarity, the Bill of Rights was 1689.

MBK is not very good with numbers. Or facts.

 

[motorbiking]

I know.

It is almost as if I studied this

Everyone should. It’s not just about understanding the history but having a basic appreciation of our constitution. Otherwise people go around thinking we don’t have one because it’s not written in a handy pamphlet. In fact ours is one of the oldest legal system with laws today founded on these constitutional rights.

 

[motorbiking]

I am assuming this was a spellchecker gone rogue. But just for the sake of clarity, the Bill of Rights was 1689.

Yes it was corrected in the thread.

 

[motorbiking]

...is not a lawful excuse.

You could post this another 100 times or you could provide some relevant law that confirms your opinion.

I think we can guess what you will do.

 

[noseall]

You could post this another 100 times or you could provide some relevant law that confirms your opinion.

I think we can guess what you will do.

Ditto.

 

[motorbiking]

Ditto.

I’ve already quoted the relevant law, your turn.

Here it is again.

Criminal Law Act 1967

An Act to amend the law of England and Wales by abolishing the division of crimes into felonies and misdemeanours and to amend and simplify the law in respect of matters arising from or related to that division or the abolition of it; to do away (within or without England and Wales) with certain...

www.legislation.gov.uk

He can also rely on the power in sec 24a police and criminal evidence act

Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984

An Act to make further provision in relation to the powers and duties of the police, persons in police detention, criminal evidence, police discipline and complaints against the police; to provide for arrangements for obtaining the views of the community on policing and for a rank of deputy...

www.legislation.gov.uk

 

[blup]

All this sanctimonious brexxer style lecturing on the unwritten Constitution. Where was it when the government decided leaving the EU didnt need an act of parliament. That the the “voice of tne people” was sufficient. That the referendum was legal authority. Enemies of the people lol.

 

[motorbiking]

What is the point of a referendum if you are planning to ignore the results? Referendums are probably the most democratic processes we have. No party politics and a simple vote.

Leave the U.K., leave the EU. Remove local councils…. Oh wait nobody asked us about that.

 

[MNW67]

All this sanctimonious brexxer style lecturing on the unwritten Constitution.

I don't know what point you are making, here. We have just been discussing what form the British Constitution takes. It is a totally non-partisan issue.

 

[MNW67]

All this sanctimonious brexxer style lecturing on the unwritten Constitution. Where was it when the government decided leaving the EU didnt need an act of parliament. That the the “voice of tne people” was sufficient. That the referendum was legal authority. Enemies of the people lol.

Although, there is an interesting corollary with what Trump is doing in the USA. Obviously, they have a written constitution but, in spite of that, they still can't agree which powers are for the President and which are for Congress.

 

[Odds]

I don't know what point you are making, here. We have just been discussing what form the British Constitution takes. It is a totally non-partisan issue.

Precedent, in a word.

 

[Odds]

Although, there is an interesting corollary with what Trump is doing in the USA. Obviously, they have a written constitution but, in spite of that, they still can't agree what powers are for the President and which are for Congress.

And i wouldn't get hooked on the American Constitution, either.
It's become a straitjacket, wrapped in the National Flag.