• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Labour thug jailed.

It will be interesting to see what deal will be done with Labour to avoid him defending his seat. Labour have said he wont be allowed back in. If he stands again, that might split the vote.
 
I don’t agree with the view that any assault can kill, most assaults are pushing, shoving, etc.

And people have died after being shoved, stumbling and banging their head. That is why saying somebody could have been killed isn't useful.
 
And people have died after being shoved, stumbling and banging their head. That is why saying somebody could have been killed isn't useful.
Threatening words or raised fists (common assault) doesn't normally result in death.

No rational person can expect to punch someone in the head hard enough to knock them to the ground and then keep going without expected to cause some damage to the brain.
 
Threatening words or raised fists (common assault) doesn't normally result in death.

No rational person can expect to punch someone in the head hard enough to knock them to the ground and then keep going without expected to cause some damage to the brain.

Are you being deliberately argumentative :) We both know from our discussion yesterday that we are talking here about battery, not assault.

And on the second point, as far as I am aware, the law doesn't look at what might have happened. Only what did happen.
 
Are you being deliberately argumentative :) We both know from our discussion yesterday that we are talking here about battery, not assault.

And on the second point, as far as I am aware, the law doesn't look at what might have happened. Only what did happen.
motorbiking doesn't have a clue...

Linky Linky
 
Are you being deliberately argumentative :) We both know from our discussion yesterday that we are talking here about battery, not assault.

And on the second point, as far as I am aware, the law doesn't look at what might have happened. Only what did happen.
I understood you to be referring to common assault, when you said all assault. If by all assault you mean something along the line of physical violence then, we are in agreement.

On your second point - it's the intent that matters (mostly).
 
motorbiking doesn't have a clue...

Linky Linky
you've just proved my point.
No rational person can expect to punch someone in the head hard enough to knock them to the ground and then keep going without expecting to cause some damage to the brain.
Did you misunderstand that common assault was only physical violence? It is also the threat. People don't normally suffer head injuries from the threat of violence (common assault).
 
On your second point - it's the intent that matters (mostly).

I think that's a different issue. You are presumably talking about the mens rea.

Whether somebody might have died is irrelevant. Obviously, unless you are talking about homicides and their attempts.
 
The point that was made (mostly by the original judge) is that lesser beatings than that dished out by Punchy Mike, have on other occasions resulted in death and for that reason he regarded it as quite serious.
 
Back
Top