Leeds court last year

[Notch7]

R E A D T H E W H O L E S E N T E N C E!
It began with, "If you wish to insist......."

It might help you to comprehend what I said. It might also help you to understand how you took my part sentence and quoted it out of context.

Stop trying to create an issue where none exists.

If only you could comprehend what you wrote.......which is still wrong. You make the claim that pointing out one thing, therefore automatically means the denial of another.....a common logical fallacy, one of of JohnD's favs.

By the way, FGM and forced marriage occurs not only in Muslim countries.....

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

First of all: a warning for the likes of a**e end, bodd, gasbag and others that have limited attention spans: this comment is about you, and others like you, but if you choose not to read it, or are incapable of reading it, that is your choice.

I guess I should have added eeyore's name to the list and included the phrase, "or unable to comprehend the written word..."

 

[EFLImpudence]

Don't forget MGM (not the films); no one cares about that.

 

[Hairymelon]

Edited

 

[Hairymelon]

Edited

 

[Deleted member 63160]

Edited

Why take it down?

 

[Hairymelon]

Because it’s getting me too stressed thanks for asking Mitch

 

[Deleted member 63160]

Because it’s getting me too stressed thanks for asking Mitch

Don't let it get to you. Not everyone thinks someone is racist for mentioning the unmentionable.

 

[Notch7]

If you wish to insist such behaviour only occurs in Muslim countries, meanwhile denying it occurs in many 'western' organisations, you deserve the 'racist' label.
Denying it occurs in 'western' organisations is tantamount to the similar cover-up that has occurred in the past in those organisations

Is that quote 'full enough'?

So now please explain where I wish to insist such behaviour only occurs in Muslim countries, whilst denying it occurs in westrtn organisations.....

On that logic, your posts imply it only occurs in Western organisations since you do not acknowledge it occurs in Muslim countries.

As I said above, you continue to make a fallacious argument, in order to label people a racist to suit your bigoted agenda.

 

[Notch7]

Don't forget MGM (not the films); no one cares about that.

Maybe not right either.

But the two are not comparable.

 

[EFLImpudence]

I didn't say they were comparable.

Same stupid reason for both, though.

 

[Notch7]

Maybe this has been the process in the CC forum where RWR, or explicit racism has been allowed to flourish and become the dominant culture, leading to further recruitment of like-minded individuals or the radicalisation of feeble minded individuals. They have then felt empowered to spread their bigoted message into the GD forum.

Bigoted attitude.......

 

[noseall]

the unmentionable......

….that it's not the sole domain of Muslim Pakistanis that systematically work in gangs to abuse children. White gangs do it too.
Well said M itch, glad you brought it to the attention of the RWR clansmen.

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

Is that quote 'full enough'?

Allow me to try and explain the conditional word 'if' to you in terms you can understand it, because you appear to be having great difficulty with it. Perhaps I will use some examples:
When I say, "if the bus is late it deserves to be labeled a slowcoach" I am not saying the bus was, is, or will be late. I am just making an observation IF the bus is late. If it is not late the condition is not met, therefore the observation is not valid.

When I say, "if it is snowing outside, it deserves to be labeled as a cold wintry day", I am not saying it was, is, or will be snowing. I am merely making an observation IF it is snowing. If it is not snowing the condition is not met therefore the observation is not valid.

When I say, "if you cannot comprehend the word 'if' you must be very stupid", I am not saying that you could not, cannot and will not understand the word. I am merely making an observation IF you cannot understand. If you can understand, then the condition is not met therefore the observation is not valid.

Do you understand now?

When I say, "If you wish to insist such behaviour only occurs in Muslim countries, meanwhile denying it occurs in many 'western' organisations, you deserve the 'racist' label. I am merely making an observation IF you insist such behaviour only occurs in Muslim countries. If you do not insist, then the condition is not met, therefore the observation is not valid.

However, going back to understanding the word 'IF', you do seem to be having some difficulty with understanding the word.

I appreciate the post might be a little too long for you to comprehend in one sitting. Do not worry, I am in no hurry for more of your silly comments.
There is no risk of a**e end or bodd responding either because the word count is way past their ability.

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

….that it's not the sole domain of Muslim Pakistanis that systematically work in gangs to abuse children. White gangs do it too.
Well said M itch, glad you brought it to the attention of the RWR clansmen.

As I said earlier, some western organisations not only 'do it as well', they do not simply ignore it or fail to challenge it, they actively close ranks to conceal that behaviour, which is far more heinous and sinister.
I suspect the scale of such behaviour within these western organisations far and away, throughout the globe, vastly outstrips the incidences of such gangs in this country. With one such organisation it was not only a global phenomenon, it was almost internationally traded abuse. One abuser shipped from one country to another to continue their abuse, while another was shipped in to replace them.
Where were the a**e ends, the eeyores, the krappykids when these western organisations were being exposed? Quietly minding their own business.

I am aware of a Catholic Church in an inner-city area that was happy to hold migrants' money for them to conceal it from the authorities. The churches payback was that they kept the interest. They did not ask questions about how the money was accumulated. For all the church cared it could be proceeds of crime, drugs, abuse, prostitution, etc.