Leicester is a hive of illegal sweatshops, and Covid.

Joined
15 Nov 2005
Messages
88,633
Reaction score
6,637
Location
South
Country
Cook Islands
https://www.ft.com/content/0e9d502e-9e6e-11ea-b65d-489c67b0d85d

"The trouble is, Mr Johnson’s plan to restart the economy safely relies on a regulator that has been systematically weakened by his own party. After a Conservative-led coalition was elected in 2010, ministers promised a bonfire of red tape for “a more growth-focused, entrepreneurial” nation.

“If we try to legislate out all risk, we will lose jobs to other places,” Conservative minister Chris Grayling explained in 2013. “You should have as light a touch as possible, that is what the HSE was constantly being told,” a member of the HSE’s board at that time said.

Funding has been cut by more than £100m since 2010 to some £130m. Its workforce shrank by one-third to about 2,400.

What has happened to the HSE is only half the story. The job of enforcing health and safety law is split between the HSE and the country’s 380 or so local authorities. The latter are responsible for “lower-risk” workplaces. Private care homes for the elderly, which Covid-19 has been ripping through, are their responsibility (the HSE takes the more medicalised nursing homes).

Retail warehouses, shops and restaurants fall to local authority inspectors. Yet the number of full-time equivalent local authority health and safety inspectors has halved since 2010 to just 480.

My analysis of official data suggests more than 140 authorities employ fewer than one full-time equivalent inspector.

As well as cutting resources, the government told the HSE and local authorities in 2011 to reduce proactive inspections by one-third. A final progress report on the reforms shows the HSE complied and cut its spot checks to some 22,000 a year, while local authorities, crushed by austerity cuts, reduced theirs by 95 per cent to about 6,300."

It's almost as if ten years of Tory government were committed to having a "bonfire of regulation."

My mistake.

That's exactly what they said they would do, and exactly what they did.

Never mind, in 2018/9 it became apparent what was going on in the garment sweatshops, and a Parliamentary Committe looked into the problem and made its recommendations.

Can you guess how many of the recommendation our Conservartive government followed up, and how many they rejected?

(a) None
(b) all
 
Sponsored Links
Government rejects recommendations to force fashion industry pay to clean up its act
ImageVaultHandler.aspx.jpg

18 June 2019
The Environmental Audit Committee publishes the Government Response to its Fixing Fashion Report: Clothing Consumption and Sustainability. The report published in February called on the Government to end the era of throwaway fashion through wide-ranging recommendations covering environmental and labour market practices. All of which have been rejected.

Environmental Audit Committee Chair Mary Creagh MP said:
“Fashion producers should be forced to clear up the mountains of waste they create. The Government has rejected our call, demonstrating that it is content to tolerate practices that trash the environment and exploit workers despite having just committed to net zero emission targets.

“The Government is out of step with the public who are shocked by the fact that we are sending 300,000 tonnes of clothes a year to incineration or landfill. Ministers have failed to recognise that urgent action must be taken to change the fast fashion business model which produces cheap clothes that cost the earth.”

On workers’ rights Mary Creagh said:
“We presented the Government with the evidence that it has failed to stop garment workers in this country being criminally underpaid, despite its claim that the number of national minimum wage inspectors has increased.

“The public has a right to know that the clothes they buy are not produced by children or forced labour, however the Government hasn’t accepted our recommendations on the Modern Slavery Act to force fashion retailers to increase transparency in their supply chains.
“This is plain wrong. The EAC will be closely monitoring steps that the Government claims it is taking to address the problems exposed in our report.”

Government’s Response to Fixing Fashion Report’s key recommendations:
  • A new Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) scheme to reduce textile waste with a one penny charge per garment on producers.
    Not accepted. Government notes EAC’s one penny per garment recommendation and will consider in development of new Extended Producer Responsibility Schemes. No detail on when EPR scheme for textiles will be introduced; consultation could run as late as 2025.
  • Ban on incinerating or landfilling unsold stock that can be reused or recycled.
    Rejected. Government considers positive approaches are required to find outlets for waste textiles rather than simply imposing a landfill ban.
  • Mandatory environmental targets for fashion retailers with a turnover above £36 million.
    Not accepted. Government points to environmental savings made by a voluntary industry-led programme but fails to address evidence from WRAP that the impact of increased volumes of clothing being sold outweighs efficiency savings made on carbon and water.
  • The fashion industry must come together to set out their blueprint for a net zero emissions world, reducing their carbon consumption back to 1990 levels.
    Not accepted. Government points to support for the voluntary Sustainable Clothing Action Plan (SCAP), co-ordinated by WRAP with the industry working towards targets to reduce carbon emissions, water and waste.
  • The scheme should reward fashion companies that design products with lower environmental impacts and penalise those that do not.
    Not accepted. Govt will focus on tax on single-use plastic in packaging, not clothing.
  • The report calls on the Government to use the tax system to shift the balance of incentives in favour of reuse, repair and recycling to support responsible fashion companies.
    Not accepted.
  • The Government should follow Sweden's lead and reduce VAT on repair services.
    It says little evidence a VAT reduction has been effective in Sweden or that savings have been passed on to consumers.
  • More proactive approach to enforcement of the National Minimum Wage with greater resourcing for HMRC’s National Minimum Wage team to increase inspection and detection work.
    Government says HMRC and other enforcement agencies already taking more proactive approach with increase in budget and officers dedicated to NMW enforcement.
  • The Government should publish a publicly accessible list of retailers required to release a modern slavery statement. This should be supported by an appropriate penalty for those companies who fail to report and comply with the Modern Slavery Act.
    No recommendations relating to modern slavery have been adopted.
Further information


https://www.parliament.uk/business/...-fashion-government-response-published-17-19/
 
Not read all that, CBA.
But I lived in Coventry for a few years and when I first arrived was surprised when I walked past a mini factory full of people making jeans, something I could never imagine existed in the UK, being brought up in the Essex countryside.

People need clothes, people need to work. We should be proud that there is a fashion industry in the UK, and that we don't have to buy all our clothes from Chinese sweatshops.

And ... all factories are really sweatshops! MPs don't tend to visit them at the height of summer when they're full, the prefer winter visits when they can wear high vis without getting all sweaty.
 
People need clothes, people need to work. We should be proud that there is a fashion industry

And do people need to work for a living wage, or for £4 an hour?

Should we be proud that safety, health and pay laws are flouted?
 
Sponsored Links
Well, no. But some people, on learning news of sweatshops in the UK that are often run by and employ non-whites, think they're a bad thing a cause spread of disease etc.
 
so who’s to blame?

As well as cutting resources, the government told the HSE and local authorities in 2011 to reduce proactive inspections by one-third. A final progress report on the reforms shows the HSE complied and cut its spot checks to some 22,000 a year, while local authorities, crushed by austerity cuts, reduced theirs by 95 per cent to about 6,300."
 
The reason there are so many sweat shops is because the Tories have decided that the only way to compete with the likes of China is to create an economy were low wage business models are allowed to thrive.
If people want to bring back manufacturing to Britain, they are either going to have to pay more for their stuff or make those at the bottom work at Chinese wage rates.
 
And do people need to work for a living wage, or for £4 an hour?

Should we be proud that safety, health and pay laws are flouted?
It would be great if i could find staff that would work for £4 an hour.

Unfortunately, i don't think they exist.
 
Lombardy has the same problem with Chinese sweat shops making 'designed in Italy' products, sticking labels on them and selling them in the Far East for big mark-ups. But many of the workers were from Hubei province and had returned just after the Chinese New Year; the rest is history........
 
I'm not looking forward to them opening up the cotton mills in Lancashire again, it was a horrible job working on t'looms.
 
And do people need to work for a living wage, or for £4 an hour?

Should we be proud that safety, health and pay laws are flouted?

You seem to be all in favour of letting in large numbers of the third world, but then start wringing your hands when you find that the third world bring their ways with them.

You can't have it both ways.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top