Make Britain Great Again

I cannot access the full article and only quote from an extract:

the blackshirt career of ex‐socialist Alexander Miles, and the transformation in the fascist movement's leadership illustrates the contradiction between ‘left‐wing’ fascist rhetoric and actions arising from the politics of class within the BUF. In this way the period 1933–4 saw the liquidation of the FUBW and the fascist movement purged of many ex‐socialists in its leadership such that the BUF came firmly under the control of middle‐class ex‐officers. Despite this, ‘left‐wing’ aspects of fascism continued to be functional in incorporating a significant working‐class membership within the BUF as long as its populist rhetoric remained uncontradicted in practice.

In practice, it's populist rhetoric was vehemently contradicted rejected by the working class, as Communism held more appeal during the 1930s, especially among the middle class, famously parodied by Orwell in "keep the aspidistra flying". Fascism was more of an upper class ideal; the obvious example being one of the Mitford sisters* and Edward VIII.

The other sister leaned towards Communism and their family Xmas' must've been a riot of fun.
 
The ideology might differ slightly, but the end results between far left and far right are usually the same, the far left don't have the moral high ground, plenty of attrocities have taken place under their banner.
 
It gets more interesting. It seems that some modern neofascists are on a rebranding exercise. They have started calling themselves Identitarians and have renamed 'ethnic cleansing' as 'remigration':

AI Overview

Many experts and anti-extremism organizations describe
identitarianism as a form of modern white nationalism and connect it directly to neo-fascism, though the groups themselves often reject the label, preferring "patriots" or "sensible nationalists".

Key Connections and Characteristics
  • Ideological overlap: Identitarian ideology shares core tenets with neo-fascism and white supremacy, including intense anti-immigration sentiment, nativism, xenophobia, and the goal of preserving a homogenous "national identity" defined by ethnicity and culture. Their central doctrine, the demand for "remigration" of settled migrant communities, is considered an extreme position.
  • Metapolitics: Identitarian groups like Generation Identity (GI) focus on "metapolitics" and cultural infiltration, aiming to shift mainstream political discourse (the "Overton Window") to the far-right, a strategy also used by earlier fascist movements.
  • Aesthetics and presentation: Unlike traditional neo-Nazi groups with overt symbols, identitarians adopt a modern, "hipster" look to appear mainstream and attract young people who might be put off by overt skinhead culture. However, this "shiny happy people" presentation is seen by researchers as a calculated rebranding that masks an extreme ideology.
  • Ties to proscribed groups: Members of identitarian groups have been found to have ties to proscribed neo-Nazi terror groups, and the movement has become a rallying point for disparate strands of white nationalism globally.
  • Academic analysis: Academic and journalistic sources often refer to the movement and associated groups using terms like "neo-fascist," "alt-right," and "far-right extremist". German domestic intelligence has classified the youth wing of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party as "definitely extremist" due to its close ties to the Identitarian Movement.
  • Shared tactics: Identitarians are known for highly publicized, carefully planned publicity stunts (e.g., occupying the Brandenburg Gate, disrupting migrant rescue efforts) and effective social media propaganda to spread their message, leveraging modern tools for a long-standing extremist agenda.
In essence, while they attempt to distance themselves from the historical baggage of the term "fascist," the underlying ideology, goals, and connections lead many observers and experts to classify identitarianism as a contemporary form of neo-fascism.
Zzzzzzzzz it's AI again.
 
The ideology might differ slightly, but the end results between far left and far right are usually the same, the far left don't have the moral high ground, plenty of attrocities have taken place under their banner.

The ideologies are total opposites :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

But it is true that many atrocities have occurred under far left regimes, from Stalin to Pol Pot.

If we want to understand what is going on today, we need to properly understand history. It seems that, across Europe, extreme right wing movements are campaigning for the ethnic cleansing of their ethnic minority citizens. I think it is only fair that we call these extreme right wing movements out for what they are, using the correct terminology: neo-fascists.
 
If we want to understand what is going on today, we need to properly understand history. It seems that, across Europe, extreme right wing movements are campaigning for the ethnic cleansing of their ethnic minority citizens. I think it is only fair that we call these extreme right wing movements out for what they are, using the correct terminology: neo-fascists.
Sadly the knuckle draggers who spend their time raising flags at half mast, painting roundabouts and congregating outside hotels don't understand a very basic reality...

They yearn for a Britain of the past (that didn't really exist), whilst ignoring the fact that their predecessors who lived in that age they crave for fought against what they have become today!
 
The ideologies are total opposites :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Nope - its power and control without challenge and blaming others for their lot.

blame the wealthy, the jew, the foreigner, the muslim etc.
But it is true that many atrocities have occurred under far left regimes, from Stalin to Pol Pot.

If we want to understand what is going on today, we need to properly understand history. It seems that, across Europe, extreme right wing movements are campaigning for the ethnic cleansing of their ethnic minority citizens. I think it is only fair that we call these extreme right wing movements out for what they are, using the correct terminology: neo-fascists.
Do any of these extreme groups have any chance of power?
 
Back
Top