Nor do I have any problem with you believing what you want to believe.
Simple.
It is not a matter of what I believe, mod 3 stated that you have a few usernames.
Or perhaps mod 3 can deny it for you......
Nor do I have any problem with you believing what you want to believe.
Simple.
I believe that I also asked M3 to consider whether or not the relevant information was personal and confidential, and whether or not the publication of it would involve the site owner in the making and publishing of a defamatory statement.
Are you in favour of publishing confidential information?oilman said:Softus, YOU were the one objecting to possible publication of "privileged" information
Our opinions seem to differ on this point. It must be the first time ever.You have more than one username on DIYnot. It's not necessary to ask mod 3 anything.
I'm positive he's from Roswell.
softus said:PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2007 2:49 pm Post Subject: Reply with quote
ricicle wrote:
It's quite strange really as the regs are non-statutory, but if you read inside they say that all electrical installations (apart from specialist installations, off-shore, mines etc) must comply with them.
It's just entrenched arrogance.
Back in 1986 I visited the IEE office, in Stevenage, to purchase a copy of the current regs (at the time, the 15th Edition).
They wouldn't sell me a copy because I wasn't a qualified electrician.
icon_exclaim.gif
They're quick to defend Softus aren't they. I can't understand why these comments are quickly being deleted.