Motability Cars

[Highway Man]

No actually jack fell down and it was only jill that tumbled

OMG

 

[morqthana]

Take it up with Rachael -- she has made the change yesterday

Rachael hasn't been posting here saying that some people should have benefits taken away from them if they can afford to pay something towards the cost of a car.

 

[aveatry]

Rachael hasn't been posting here saying that some people should have benefits taken away from them if they can afford to pay something towards the cost of a car.

STOP WASTING MY TIME YOU FRUIT CAKE

 

[Highway Man]

STOP WASTING MY TIME YOU FRUIT CAKE

 

[securespark]

STOP WASTING MY TIME YOU FRUIT CAKE

You are the only person doing that.

You are, are you not, choosing to reply?

 

[morqthana]

STOP WASTING MY TIME YOU FRUIT CAKE

Oh well - that neatly illustrates how unable you are to justify yourself.

 

[morqthana]

You are the only person doing that.

You are, are you not, choosing to reply?

He's choosing to shout insults at me because he finds that preferable to giving proper replies to questions I ask him about his policy ideas.

 

[Highway Man]

He's choosing to shout insults at me when he finds that proper replies to questions I ask him are outside his reach.

Ahhh there you go. Here is an example of your insults

 

[morqthana]

How is that an insult?

THIS is an insult, and you approved of it:

STOP WASTING MY TIME YOU FRUIT CAKE

 

[Highway Man]

he finds that proper replies to questions I ask him are beyond his reach.

No he doesn't,

 

[morqthana]

If you want to complain about insults, here are a few to be getting on with

Notches Dad - defends his Son - like farther and son they both have unresolved mental issues.

you nutter

you are clearly becoming (are) unhinged

 

[morqthana]

No he doesn't,

Does he not.

He puts forward a policy proposal, when asked to explain it in a bit more detail, and justify the different way it would work for different people, he first of all ignores it and then when asked again shouts abuse.

But if that's not because he can't answer the question, is it because he is the sort of person who prefers to shout abuse rather than answer?

 

[aveatry]

You are the only person doing that.

You are, are you not, choosing to reply?

Make him stoooop

 

[aveatry]

Does he not.

He puts forward a policy proposal, when asked to explain it in a bit more detail, and justify the different way it would work for different people, he first of all ignores it and then when asked again shouts abuse.

But if that's not because he can't answer the question, is it because he is the sort of person who prefers to shout abuse rather than answer?

I am not your friend because I once replied to you - now Leave me alone - go and ask Rachel, I am not interested in talking to you --NO ONE IS

 

[morqthana]

I am not your friend because I once replied to you - now Leave me alone - go and ask Rachel, I am not interested in talking to you --NO ONE IS

Discussion forums don't work like that. If you want to only talk to specific people, use private messaging, or WhatsApp.

If you post something like this

My whole point is not that I am against the benefit but if you can afford the extra dosh for a range rover or £115k bmw then you don not need any hand out in the first place, unless you need things fitted to enable you to drive.

then as long as I don't do something like shout "YOU FRUITCAKE" at you because of what you believe, it's perfectly reasonable for me to ask you to explain how this "afford the extra dosh" based reduction in people's benefits, or denying disabled people the freedom to make choices, would work via a couple of examples of people receiving benefits and spending them in different ways.