mug shot

[noseall]

yes

I saw no evidence of a deterrent working there. Just MBK waffle.

 

[motorbiking]

https://library.college.police.uk/docs/moj/publicising-criminal-convictions.pdf

Deterring offenders

Publicising convictions also acts as a deterrent to other criminals if they think that the consequence of committing crime is likely to result in publicity. There is no doubt that offenders will not want such publicity – but they should not be able to hide behind the criminal justice service.

hard to argue with that, no?

 

[MNW67]

Part of the deterrent for criminals is having their crimes and identities made public.

That makes sense.

 

[noseall]

https://library.college.police.uk/docs/moj/publicising-criminal-convictions.pdf

hard to argue with that, no?

But does it really deter serious criminals? I doub't it.

 

[ReganAndCarter]

How can you tell? According to RAC, 90% of her face is covered.

I take it all back. I can now see why they fecking covered her up.

 

[ReganAndCarter]

But it seems that this woman wanted a different one to be released to the public, with her wearing a burka. Is that really a problem. I don't think it would have bothered me.

Two questions. What is the point of releasing a mugshot that doesn't identify anyone? Secondly, should the crim have a choice over how their mugshot is presented to the public?

And a bonus one - is everyone entitled to this special treatment, or only protected minorities?

 

[noseall]

I take it all back.

I did wonder (when I saw that pic) why you thought you could only see 10% of her face....? I thought you'd been on an all-day Wevvies sesh.

 

[motorbiking]

But does it really deter serious criminals? I doub't it.

whether your opinion is correct or not, it remains a fact that this is the objective.

 

[ReganAndCarter]

I did wonder (when I saw that pic) why you thought you could only see 10% of her face....? I thought you'd been on an all-day Wevvies sesh.

Go one, Nosey. Just for once in your life thank me. You know you want to.

 

[noseall]

Two questions. What is the point of releasing a mugshot that doesn't identify anyone?

You mean why did they release both pictures?

Secondly, should the crim have a choice over how their mugshot is presented to the public?

Which mugshot that the Wail presented to the public, are you referring to

And a bonus one - is everyone entitled to this special treatment, or only protected minorities?

What treatment?

 

[MNW67]

What is the point of releasing a mugshot that doesn't identify anyone?

My main question was around why mug shots are released at all. But MBK has cleared that up.

But I suppose if you were to see her in the street wearing a burka, neither of the photos would be much help.

 

[noseall]

it remains a fact that this is the objective.

I never questioned the objective nor is it relevant to what is disputed. You claimed it acts a deterrent. I doubt it makes little difference, especially to serious crime.

 

[noseall]

press release

You and your press releases eh MBK, not done much good there eh...

 

[motorbiking]

back to trolling ey boyo.

keep up the good work

 

[motorbiking]

My main question was around why mug shots are released at all. But MBK has cleared that up.

But I suppose if you were to see her in the street wearing a burka, neither of the photos would be much help.

So there is really no benefit of taking the photo of her in her Niqab.

btw a burka covers the eyes too.