- Joined
- 28 Apr 2004
- Messages
- 7,467
- Reaction score
- 684
- Country
So no examples then
Nepotism on the telly
- Thread starter Mottie
- Start date
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 7 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 13,089
- Reaction score
- 3,022
- Country
I thought Bobby Jizzler had left.
D
durhamplumber
I was hoping.It is back with its special brand of sanctimonious lack of humour.
D
dontbelieveawordofit
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,395
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
So that is who's opinion you copied?
Maybe you should consider which other organisations operate out of 57 Tufton Street.
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,395
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2018
- Messages
- 523
- Reaction score
- 105
- Country
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,395
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
Change.org is a run-for-profit website, anyone can start a petition:
The petition has garnered 384 signatures in one year. That's going some.
And from the same link
Ofcom’s Kevin Bakhurst, himself a former senior BBC News executive, said the case raised concerns about whether the public broadcaster’s complaints process could still command the confidence of the public, not least because it could not explain on what basis – other than public outrage – the director general had overturned the original decision.
“We’ll be requiring the BBC to be more transparent about its processes and compliance findings as a matter of urgency,” he said.
Ofcom’s Kevin Bakhurst, himself a former senior BBC News executive, said the case raised concerns about whether the public broadcaster’s complaints process could still command the confidence of the public, not least because it could not explain on what basis – other than public outrage – the director general had overturned the original decision.
“We’ll be requiring the BBC to be more transparent about its processes and compliance findings as a matter of urgency,” he said.
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,395
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
So what?
bennymultifinish posted the Naga Munchetty saga as an example of how BBC is supposedly the worst at employing people who are not the best person for the job.
The BBC upheld a viewers complaint, and tried to prevent an internal investigation. The Director General overturned their decision, which Ofcom fully agreed with.
How does that support bennymultifinish's comment?
I'll repeat the question, so what is the point of your additional quote of the link?
Read your own link, the Beeb tried to prevent an external investigation, regardless of outcome, they had their knuckles rapped. Bennys point stands and you're a fool.
- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,395
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
Nonsense!
BBC criticised Naga. The Director General overturned that criticism.
Ofcom agreed with the Director General that Naga did nothing wrong.
Ofcom's comments about the processes were merely incidental, and not relevant to the outcomes.
To use a comparison. Man City were penalised for financial irregularities because UEFA could not understand their accounting procedures.
It did not mean that Man City were bankrupt, nor that they were corrupt. UEFA based their decision on not understanding the accounting process.
That penalty was overturned.
Similarly, Ofcom could not understand the process by which BBC arrived at their decision, but they agreed with the decision.
It is completely irrelevant to the story, the outcome or the issue about Naga Munchetty.
It's incidental, but not influential.
The fact that the you resort to insults merely reinforces my consideration of how weak is your argument.
No they didn't.
You tried the same lies about Emily Maitlis where you stated the BBC "had to make a grovelling apology".....they did not make an apology.
Sponsored Links
