Check if the flow and return are still as they were with the Puma...even bi-directional TRVs have a limit on "reversed flow" differential pressure up to a point.
The Puma should have had a bypass valve installed across the flow and return, these were generally a gate valve to ensure a minimum flow rate through the boiler. This would reduce somewhat the differential pressure across the TRVs. The majority of modern boilers have a built-in automatic bypass. This is primarily to protect the boiler and may not be sufficient when the system has several TRVs. Some boiler bypasses are adjustable to cope with the system but this is rare.
So you may require an auto bypass valve (correctly set) installed across the flow and return to reduce the pressure across the TRVs especially as they shut down.
The pump in the boiler must be left at its maximum setting since it is required to circulate sufficient water when operating in hot water mode, despite being too powerful for the heating.
The Puma should have had a bypass valve installed across the flow and return, these were generally a gate valve to ensure a minimum flow rate through the boiler. This would reduce somewhat the differential pressure across the TRVs. The majority of modern boilers have a built-in automatic bypass. This is primarily to protect the boiler and may not be sufficient when the system has several TRVs. Some boiler bypasses are adjustable to cope with the system but this is rare.
So you may require an auto bypass valve (correctly set) installed across the flow and return to reduce the pressure across the TRVs especially as they shut down.
The pump in the boiler must be left at its maximum setting since it is required to circulate sufficient water when operating in hot water mode, despite being too powerful for the heating.
