Yep, it it isn't part of a cable (or in conduits etc) then 4mm for mechanical protection which isn't really viable in lighting circuits. T'is in section 54 of the big red book iirc
Ah, yes, we've been through that one before. It's 543.1.1. As you say,
'if it's not part of a cable' it needs to be 4mm² without mechanical protection (2.5mm² with protection), just as for supplementary bonding.
However, as we discussed before, what is this 'if it's not part of a cable'? What is a cable? Part II of the regs doesn't give a definition, yet we have Tables, such as 4D1A, which give characteristics of 'single core insulated cables, with or without sheath'. That bit of BS7671 therefore regards a single-insulated G/Y as being 'a cable' !!
I suppose we can agree that what they probably meant to say was 'if it's not part of a multicore cable ....' - but they didn't, so I'm not sure where that theoretically leaves us
Whatever, as others have pointed out, I think we can agree that by the time one has run G/Y (of whatever CSA) alongside all the wiring of a lighting circuit, it would have been both easier and cheaper to replace it all with T&E.
Kind Regards, John.