Perjury

[joe-90]

Sorry, but it's not fishing. That's how I see it. Are you the same person you were as 17 year old? Why am I not allowed an opinion just because it differs from yours?

As I said:

You're fully entitled to your misguided opinions Joe

As you well know, we agree on lots of things.

Fishing or not (I still think you are), I'm not getting into it with you Joe for that very reason.

I'm not trolling. The people that committed the crime are now adults - you can't punish the perpetrators as they no-longer exist.

 

[Blasphemous]

Joe.
You now have been warned personally by a mod.

Two faced that he is.

Shoo fly.

 

[Blasphemous]

They were under age.

They were juveniles at the time they committed murder. This isn't a case of a 16 and 17 year old caught drinking!

They did not commit murder.
Please get your facts right.

Oh dear.

 

[ryme64]

Two men found guilty of the 1993 racist murder of Stephen Lawrence in south-east London have been jailed for life.

They did not commit murder.

Look at the definition of murder.

Pre meditated.

Please keep up

 

[joe-90]

I find this completely immoral:


"Dobson, 36, a father of two, was identified as the gang’s weakest link several years ago and was even offered immunity against prosecution if he agreed to testify against the others in January 1995.

However, the tactic failed and Dobson continued to insist that none of them had been involved.

Now, as a convicted murderer who has always protested his innocence, he would have to divulge important new information, that could also be corroborated, for any chance of receiving a lighter sentence."

How can you let a murderer off by turning 'supergrass'?

 

[ryme64]

I find this completely immoral:


"Dobson, 36, a father of two, was identified as the gang’s weakest link several years ago and was even offered immunity against prosecution if he agreed to testify against the others in January 1995.

However, the tactic failed and Dobson continued to insist that none of them had been involved.

Now, as a convicted murderer who has always protested his innocence, he would have to divulge important new information, that could also be corroborated, for any chance of receiving a lighter sentence."

How can you let a murderer off by turning 'supergrass'?

He is not a murderer.

 

[joe-90]

They don't even know who actually wielded the knife.

 

[spacecat]

I tell you what if a 17 year old killed your kid/wife/boyfriend you wouldnt care
how long it took to get justice

OH NO i fed the TROLL!!!!

 

[spacecat]

They don't even know who actually wielded the knife.

Why dont you read the JUDGES report .....you know those people who are in charge of the law and know a bit about it , rather than inflicting your dip S**t ideas on us


OH NO I DID IT AGAIN!

 

[JohnD]

He is not a murderer.

Just to clarify, I am saying he is a murderer based on English law, as evidenced by him having been found guilty of murder in court, and sentenced for murder.

I don't pretend to know the different definition that ryme is working on.

 

[joe-90]

They don't even know who actually wielded the knife.

Why dont you read the JUDGES report .....you know those people who are in charge of the law and know a bit about it , rather than inflicting your dip S**t ideas on us


OH NO I DID IT AGAIN!

I read it in the paper.

 

[JohnD]

here you are

http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resourc...s/sentencing-remarks-dobson-norris-120104.pdf

 

[joe-90]

So who had the knife then?

 

[Infidel]

If it was not murder what was it ? a heated debate that got out of control? One of the participents who had a knife stabbed the other,either way premeditated.
He had a knife and used it whether in the heat of the moment or not he pulled the knife out and killed someone, So he must have thought about it.
It was not a general ruck fists flying etc.

 

[joe-90]

But who used the knife and why was Norris offered immunity from prosecution? Why would they let him off unless they knew he didn't wield the knife? If they knew that - then why has he been convicted of premeditated murder?