Perjury

[joe-90]

What about the rest of the group? Why aren't they in court too?

 

[Gasman28]

The presumption was made that because there was a conviction, then the witness must be lying...

Therefore by that logic, whenever someone is convicted them anyone who has been a witness/given an alibi for the defence should be done for perjury...

How do you come to that conclusion? As stated previously, blood stains were found on the defendents clothes, therefore, the jury decided that was proof enough to convict them. Therefore, they were there, commited the crime and were not at home as the parents swore on oath to the court.

I've no idea what happened, but it has been known for the police to do just that...

Your right, you have no idea what happened

Show me where I've said I want to " stand by the side of these people"...

You haven't actually stated that fact, but then again, you appear to not want see the light of day. You haven't openly stated, as far as I recall, that these murderers deserve all they get, yet you are quick to join on the Joe bandwagon to criticise everyone else, especially the original OP's remarks.

 

[Gasman28]

JUDGE says it doesnt matter all are complicit ALL are murderers

by being party and involved you are just as guilty as it should be

Absolute and utter garbage.

How can you justify such a statement? If all five of the gang were out looking for trouble and they decided to chase an innocent man, then one of the gang killed him, they are all complicit. Watch the covert videos and tell me they are angels. Acting in front of the camera, I think not.

 

[joe-90]

But did they all know that one of them would pull out a knife and kill him? I doubt it - so the intent isn't there.

 

[Alarm]

How do you come to that conclusion? As stated previously, blood stains were found on the defendents clothes, therefore, the jury decided that was proof enough to convict them. Therefore, they were there, commited the crime and were not at home as the parents swore on oath to the court.

Yet the clothes were mixed with the victims, miss that bit did you?
Not saying one or all were innocent, but bigger cases have been thrown out for that incompetence.

 

[Gasman28]

Yet the clothes were mixed with the victims, miss that bit did you?

As far as I am aware, the clothes were in seperate bags and were not ( as the defence claimed ) contaminated with other clothes.

Not saying one or all were innocent, but bigger cases have been thrown out for that incompetence.

You might be right there fella, but 18 years on, Forensic Science has progressed and has now proven that they are guilty.

 

[libby lou lou]

But did they all know that one of them would pull out a knife and kill him? I doubt it - so the intent isn't there.

How the hell can you doubt one had a knife after those vids?

I alone can imagine their attitudes, i think your right on many things about this case, but your on a loser here.

I pesonally think this case will collapse on the forensic after a scientist said he couldn't change the gelled blood back to liquid and he'd never done this test before.

Tomorrow, someone will do it.

 

[ellal]

How do you come to that conclusion?

I suggest you read through Blas's posts...

Your right, you have no idea what happened

Nor do you...

You haven't actually stated that fact, but then again, you appear to not want see the light of day.

So, yet again claiming something was said that wasn't actually said...

You haven't openly stated, as far as I recall, that these murderers deserve all they get, yet you are quick to join on the Joe bandwagon to criticise everyone else, especially the original OP's remarks.

So you assume what someone is thinking by what they haven't said?...As I said, 'numpty's law'!

I jump on nobody's bandwagon - some of us can think for ourselves..

And since the OP was making a remark that was clearly rather silly, then a reply was warranted...

As well as to those who make the same mistakes...

 

[Gasman28]

But did they all know that one of them would pull out a knife and kill him? I doubt it - so the intent isn't there.

If someone of that intelect carries a knife, then the 'intent' is always there.

 

[Gasman28]

How do you come to that conclusion?

I suggest you read through Blas's posts...

I have read Blas's threads for a few years now and can honestly say that he is one honest guy that says it as he sees it.

Your right, you have no idea what happened

Nor do you...

I never stated that I did, but then again, I believe that the criminal justice system has got it right.

You haven't actually stated that fact, but then again, you appear to not want see the light of day.

So, yet again claiming something was said that wasn't actually said...

You haven't openly stated, as far as I recall, that these murderers deserve all they get, yet you are quick to join on the Joe bandwagon to criticise everyone else, especially the original OP's remarks.

So you assume what someone is thinking by what they haven't said?...As I said, 'numpty's law'!

So do you think they are innocent?

And since the OP was making a remark that was clearly rather silly, then a reply was warranted...

Why silly? Perhaps your Myopic viewpoint can transend into one that can see beyond the hype and hysteria. Todays technology has proved that at least two of the gang are murderers. Todays technology has proved that two of them were there at the time of the crime. Therefore, it is concluded that the murderers parents statements on oath were lies - therefore - perjury.

As well as to those who make the same mistakes...

 

[spacecat]

they have gone down and are staying down possibly for even longer than they have been sentenced for

hopefully 15 years and few incidents in the shower will teach them that no matter what you do and think you can get away with you might not!

 

[libby lou lou]

Are you young or just nieve ..

 

[libby lou lou]

I am thick as i don't know how the banking system screws me but don't have a mortgage, but own my house, iv'e been in prison, gone through the system and still come out tops, you know shiites.

I am the bigger picture. you are young?

 

[spacecat]

I am thick as i don't know how the banking system screws me but don't have a mortgage, but own my house, iv'e been in prison, gone through the system and still come out tops, you know shiites.

I am the bigger picture. you are young?

So your an ex con who own s A house....in
Lancashire!


Wooppie f"""""ing dooo

I wish I had achieved that in life..........not

 

[sooey]

You meanwhile rent one, or own the toilet seat on one down in that seething cesspit....enjoy.