Yet you chose to watch itA video about stating the bleedin obvious. Thanks for that I feel enlightened, not!
It does seem disingenuous not to say in the first place that 67% of positives are false
Exactly.Your link includes this;
"What is the UK operational false positive rate? The UK operational false positive rate is unknown. There are no published studies on the operational false positive rate of any national COVID-19 testing programme. An attempt has been made to estimate the likely false-positive rate of national COVID-19 testing programmes by examining data from published external quality assessments (EQAs) for RT-PCR assays for other RNA viruses carried out between 2004-2019 [7]. Results of 43 EQAs were examined, giving a median false positive rate of 2.3% (interquartile range 0.8-4.0%)."
Why do you think covid will be any different?The problem is it is all based on estimations and isn't based on Covid but "other RNA viruses" from 2004 till 2019.
Yes, but that is the accusation made for anyone who disagrees.And this,
"UK Column is the preserve of crackpot conspiracy theorists, which is no surprise given that it is the work of leading crackpot conspiracy theorist Brian Gerrish."
Exactly.
It does seem disingenuous not to say in the first place that 67% of positives are false
Why do you think covid will be any different?
Is it correct that the PCR test cannot distinguish between covid and other RNA viruse?