- Joined
- 22 Aug 2006
- Messages
- 7,738
- Reaction score
- 1,435
- Country

Nope. A Wild Goose.

That's too radical a way to avoid IHTLet me know if he needs someone to post bail.
They might have been selling the vans. Classic ramming device.I speculate that it was Iran-organised and the whole thing was a wind-up. Get a bunch of dodgy looking young fellers to act suspiciously around a key air base, make everyone panic and demonstrate that Iran has boots on the ground in the UK, all without anyone actually breaking any laws.
If so then it was a very successful operation.
The fuel theft thing is probably a story to cover up embarrassment, they were probably empty vans.
Im not sure Trumpf and the loyalists that are taking over the CI A are that sophisticatedMaybe it was a murrican plot, to throw suspicion and guilt on the Eyerainians.
Maybe not, but better bomb Eyeran in case.
Better to bomb them than expose a murrican.
Wasn't that the theme of a bombing team on a Sunday eve TV thriller?

By calling the rozzers themselves? Explain?They are lucky not to get shot, the way they were behaving.
Five blokes in three fake signed vans is not a wind up. They were there on business of some kind. It is inconceivable that releasing them on pre charge bail is appropriate if there was any real suspicion of their involvement in terorrist activity knowing or unknowing.They didn't invade the base, they just hung around the perimeter looking like dodgy geezers. If anyone had shot them it would have been murder, of course they weren't at any personal risk.
It was all a wind-up, i bet you. But our government won't admit they've been toyed with.
The Russians - I'd have expected slightly more professional from them.State-sponsored mischief.