There is a fair bit of grey in this!
While I agree that plasterers etc should have some knowledge of regs, I don't think the onus should be on them to make sure they are compliant.
To stretch the point a bit - If I take my car to the garage to get it fixed, the garage doesn't check if I am insured to drive, have a licence, MOT or indeed own the car. (If I have an illegal tyre, they will tell me, but they won't force me to change it and will let me back out on the road.) The customer asks for a service, and it is provided.
When I used to build extensions, an architect (and engineer ) drew up and or okayed the plans. If we fell foul of anything, their insurance was in place to cover them. That is why I paid them.
If as a plasterer I am asked to plaster an extension inside and out, I am going to assume that it has been built to building regs and got PP if appropriate. I would not feel any way obliged to independently make sure it had been before I rendered it.
However -
,as part of being a professional, in the conversation as part of the process when pricing - did you have any trouble getting PP, has the Building Inspector been out to check? What did the council/local authority say when you asked them about ....? Do they need to check your insulation before tacking the ceiling ? etc
As a plasterer I don't feel the need to be up to speed with it all, that is beyond the scope of the job - but I do agree fully that the client should be asked if checks have been made with the relevant authorities ie the onus is on them to do so. You can only take them at their word if they have.
I have walked away from jobs in the past for similar reasons (I did not want to be associated with them) but I would find it hard condemn anyone for just doing a job that they were asked to do.
While I agree that plasterers etc should have some knowledge of regs, I don't think the onus should be on them to make sure they are compliant.
To stretch the point a bit - If I take my car to the garage to get it fixed, the garage doesn't check if I am insured to drive, have a licence, MOT or indeed own the car. (If I have an illegal tyre, they will tell me, but they won't force me to change it and will let me back out on the road.) The customer asks for a service, and it is provided.
When I used to build extensions, an architect (and engineer ) drew up and or okayed the plans. If we fell foul of anything, their insurance was in place to cover them. That is why I paid them.
If as a plasterer I am asked to plaster an extension inside and out, I am going to assume that it has been built to building regs and got PP if appropriate. I would not feel any way obliged to independently make sure it had been before I rendered it.
However -
,as part of being a professional, in the conversation as part of the process when pricing - did you have any trouble getting PP, has the Building Inspector been out to check? What did the council/local authority say when you asked them about ....? Do they need to check your insulation before tacking the ceiling ? etc
As a plasterer I don't feel the need to be up to speed with it all, that is beyond the scope of the job - but I do agree fully that the client should be asked if checks have been made with the relevant authorities ie the onus is on them to do so. You can only take them at their word if they have.
I have walked away from jobs in the past for similar reasons (I did not want to be associated with them) but I would find it hard condemn anyone for just doing a job that they were asked to do.