Animals learn, and what we have a problem with is keeping up with their learning. I remember a problem with birds and fast jets, and the first thought was get rid of the birds, but it was found birds use to the fast jets would stay safely on the ground, remove them and new birds would come in, which would not stay on the ground. So better not getting rid of the birds who had learnt.
As to if they can learn about wind farms etc, remains to be worked out, migratory birds are most likely to be affected, but if all countries have wind farms but one, then the birds from the one without are likely in danger as they will not know the danger.
But I am not so worried about other animals, I am worried about the human animal, and how far a shard of ice can travel, and also what effect removing energy from wind, wave and tide will have on the environment be it good or bad, already we have found tidal lagoons can start to smell really bad as the material is not removed by the tide, so one tidal lagoon in France now only generates in one direction, but it may well be other factors come to play over time, and the problem is only temporary.
The main problem is knee-jerk reactions, where we try to introduce changes too quickly, mainly by governments taxing or giving grants, so some process is speeded up. If we move slowly, we can see the errors and correct in time, but moving fast, we can end up with another Diesel fiasco, where one minute it is the best thing since sliced bread, and the next we are told how bad they are, same with catalytic converters in our exhaust, rather than lean-burn engines.
Knee-jerk laws can stop essential development.
Just PV solar panels can have effects never considered, I have seen it with my own house, a 65 watt fat tube fluorescent fitting in my kitchen worked well, the tubes lasted around 5 to 10 years, it was a re-cycled fitting, but that did not matter.
Then the fat tubes could not be got, so had to fit thin ones, marked 58 watt, the ballast was not changed, and these did not last as long, around 2 to 3 years, might stretch to 5 years, then some local bungalows had solar panels, this resulted in the supply voltage being dropped, it was always around the 250 volt level, and it dropped to around 230 volts, this resulted in the fluorescent tube only lasting around 3 months.
So I was left with two options, one renew the ballast with an electronic one, two move to LED, I went for LED, but either way things should be supported for 7 years, but had I gone down the electronic ballast route, it was not supported for 7 years, and the whole story would have changed if in 1994 when we harmonised with Europe if the voltage has actually dropped.
And I would not think anyone thought that fitting solar panels in one home, would stop lights working in another.
I have moved since then, and volts here are on the high side, have seen it hit 250 volts, at the moment 244.9 volts, I am seeing more and more solar panels being fitted, and I suppose at some point the supply voltage will be adjusted, but this must be a headache for the suppliers, as the whole usage patten changes, with a massive winter demand due to less solar and heat pumps, and a negative demand in the summer.
I am one of those who only use off-peak supplies, but there is very little industry around me to use the power in the day, so it seems we need a new national grid, Britain's National Grid started on July 14, 1928 December 2008 last hamlet in wales connected to it.
So we should expect it to take quite a long time to up-grade it.