So, wrong again Tony! There isn't a book and judges aren't stupid.The Judge would then throw the book at Chris!
There are situations every day where pro engineers have to, or choose to, apparently infringe one regulation or another. We know the reasons why the hose shouldn't be used (heat) so if we avoid the problem then we can show that our method is "as safe as" the standard measure.
In the same way, you would be in trouble if you rigorously applied a regulation where it were clear that to do so would be dangerous.
Boiler mountings is a simple example. Just because they're supplied with a boiler doesn't guarantee their adequacy, and it doesn't always say "use your judgement". DIA's pipe is another example.
No but it would take a court to decide - we bear the responsibility for our decisions. We are not only entitled to make them, it's our obligation to make an engineering assessment of risk.Just because Chris thinks its OK does not mean that it is!
By the way on the corgi website it say that pipes behind DFE's have to be kept below 1000 degrees. 999 OK then? Copper wouldn't quite be molten!
