A
Alarm
Any other method is pointless nonsense
Might have missed something but the SD3 mentioned is made for this.
Or one of these issues at least.
Any other method is pointless nonsense
17th man igniore his idiotic comments, the answer to your problem lies in monitoring the correct effect of the equipment, ie the loss of heat. Any other method is pointless nonsense, and johnw2 is an expert at pointless meaningless nonsense.
Kind Regards, John.However, as others have said, I would have thought the real concern would be about loss of adequate heating, whether due to RCD tripping or anything else (e.g. heating system failure) - so an alarm based on heat sensing might actually be what's needed. That could be wirelessly connected to house or might possibly be able to use spare cores in the supply cable.
Do you listen to OP's? ....And then ... despite your total lack of knowledge or common sense about the subject, you waffle on about some nonsense involving emergency light fittings.
I have repeatedly suggested that, if power failure detection is what is required (and that's what the OP told us originally, and has now re-asserted), then it would probably be better to simply use a relay rather than trying to butcher an emergency light fitting (and if you think the emergency light idea was "nonsense", you'd better take that up with the OP, who was the one who suggested it).At this stage i am primarily interested in reporting a power failure to the shed, rather then any temperature control...
I take it this is a vivarium, therefore the concern is loss of heat, therefore you need stats to indicate that loss. With the outputs wired in parallel to an alarm in the house.
The SD3 option would work fine. Holmslaw isn't saying it wouldn't.
What won't work is a power failure relay whether it be a dedicated relay or a butchered emergency light.
If the heating fails but the power stays live such as an element failing, this would not be reported to the house, so the system doesn't work.
If you had a simple ('passive') thermostat in the important part of the shed, connected to the house via one or two spare cores, it would be totally non-reliant on any power at the shed, and you could do what you wanted with it (to activate alarms etc.) in the house.The more i think about it, i am considering that. but if there is a power failure to the shed/outbuilding
1) there is no reporting to the house from the stat other than battery back up or relay.
That's an important point. It's arguably better to know that there's been a power failure and that the temperature will drop within a few hours than to not know until the temperature has already dropped. However, I still think that there should be a temperature-based alarm as well, since heating could fail (partially or completely) in the absense of power failure.2) it may be more important to recognise power failure to the shed/outbuilding either from the main board or db2 rather than an element because it would take a few hours to drop in temperature.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local