Ssssssshhhhhh, don't mention Reform.

[motorbiking]

Who prevented then from entering UK waters?
Come on! Stand up, who was responsible?
Who intentionally jeopardised the safety of a flimsy overloaded boat?

If Reform get to No.10, I'll submit my bid to operate it. thanks to you and Notch, we've explored every possible objection that could ever have been invented or imagined and put it to bed. Thanks for the help.

£100M a year should do it.

 

[Deleted member 323070]

Does TomWW ever shut up?.....
Jeeezzzus

OMG!


Hint, you're not obliged to read my posts.
If you don't want to participate, there's no obligation to do so.
Unless you just want to remind us all that you're still here and alert.

 

[Deleted member 323070]

You making the same incorrect interpretation of regulations, time and time and time and time and time and time again.
It's your opinion that they are incorrect. You rely on a boat full of illegal immigrants on passage to the UK being protected by an asylum claim they haven't yet made. I've shown you that they get jailed for immigration offences and I've shown you that breaching immigration and customs laws is classed as passage that is not innocent. Its clearly written, you can't ignore the facts.

Pushbcks
Nobody is intentionally endangering life other than the skipper and trafficker of the illegal boat.

Finding the exact line for the border. So that they can mark it, and the refugees would know where they are.
No need to worry, it's already been done. There are plenty of free apps which show it.

that killed your argument. did you read it?

I did.
Did you?
A little excerpt:

But people who make the Channel crossing are protected by international law if they claim asylum once they arrive.

 

[pete01]

OMG....mororbiking has the patience of a saint....

First the Katie Hopkins thread now here...

And one more For TomWW......OMG

 

[motorbiking]

We were discussing the ludicrous idea of a pushback overcoming the force of the outboard motor.

You don't understand how a boat steers. it is not my vessel's motor (a 200hp jet ski) vs yours (a fake 15hp outboard).

Imagine you are holding a broom arms outstretched, you can move it from side to side. Imagine I place a finger at the end of the broom, no amount off effort from your end will stop me preventing it from moving from side to side with the tiniest of effort. Its the simple physics of levers.

 

[pete01]

you're not obliged to read my posts

OMG, thank God

 

[Highway Man]

your creeping up to him is cringe...........supporting his lies

poor old Motorbiking has got destroyed in every point he has made

I wonder what nonsense he will come up with next

Not in the least. You just don't like the fact that he knows more than you .. Your just lashing out now at anyone who agrees with him.

 

[motorbiking]

I did.
Did you?
A little excerpt:

It confirms they have no protection until they claim asylum and cannot claim asylum from the UK until they reach the UK.

turning around illegal immigrants in boats and preventing them from entering UK waters = legal.

 

[motorbiking]

Not in the least. You just don't like the fact that he knows more than you .. Your just lashing out now at anyone who agrees with him.

its not hard.

 

[Highway Man]

its not hard.

I bet he wished he really did have a degree now. He might join tom tit on an open university course on the life and times of Francis of Asisis.

 

[Deleted member 323070]

You making the same incorrect interpretation of regulations, time and time and time and time and time and time again.
It's your opinion that they are incorrect. You rely on a boat full of illegal immigrants on passage to the UK being protected by an asylum claim they haven't yet made. I've shown you that they get jailed for immigration offences and I've shown you that breaching immigration and customs laws is classed as passage that is not innocent. Its clearly written, you can't ignore the facts.

But people who make the Channel crossing are protected by international law if they claim asylum once they arrive.

Pushbcks
Nobody is intentionally endangering life other than the skipper and trafficker of the illegal boat.

Obviously you've never tried to push a boat while at sea. That's why they're taken 'in tow'
It's extremely easy to capsize another boat by pushing it, especially from a side.

Finding the exact line for the border. So that they can mark it, and the refugees would know where they are.
No need to worry, it's already been done. There are plenty of free apps which show it.

And the small boat arrivals have access to various pieces of equipment, various agreements, etc.

that killed your argument. did you read it?

There's no such thing as a 'take back'. It's a new invention of yours.
It's all push back. Unless you are referring to one country accepting refugees back.
'Take back' means the country that is doing the taking, is the country that is accepting the refugees back.

 

[Deleted member 323070]

OMG....mororbiking has the patience of a saint....

First the Katie Hopkins thread now here...

And one more For TomWW......OMG

Yes, I'm the one responsible for posting the same old tired arguments time and time and time and, in the hope I'll get a different result.

 

[Deleted member 323070]

You don't understand how a boat steers. it is not my vessel's motor (a 200hp jet ski) vs yours (a fake 15hp outboard).

Imagine you are holding a broom arms outstretched, you can move it from side to side. Imagine I place a finger at the end of the broom, no amount off effort from your end will stop me preventing it from moving from side to side with the tiniest of effort. Its the simple physics of levers.

It's illegal to interfere and endanger another vessel at sea.
What part of that don't you get?

 

[Deleted member 323070]

Your just lashing out now at anyone who agrees with him.

I'm not lashing out at you. I'm laughing at the naivety of your comments.

 

[Deleted member 323070]

OMG, thank God

You're welcome.