Boris Johnson made loads of U turns.
Ssssssshhhhhh, don't mention Reform.
- Thread starter fillyboy
- Start date
Prefer not to say eh? No surprises there then.
I see Zia Yusuf lied.
He said Asylum.Seekers were getting TV licenses paid for by Kent County Council.
The reality is that children in care are given TV licenses - group not individual. Some of those children are asylum seekers that have no adult. It's paid for by central govt not Kent County Council.
Reform supporters like Mottie won't care being lied to, they will just make excuses.
He said Asylum.Seekers were getting TV licenses paid for by Kent County Council.
The reality is that children in care are given TV licenses - group not individual. Some of those children are asylum seekers that have no adult. It's paid for by central govt not Kent County Council.
Reform supporters like Mottie won't care being lied to, they will just make excuses.
We have law and order, Labour put a stop to violent rioters pretty quickly.I hope that reform can get a grip on law and order on our streets.
Shocking moment teenage vandal breaks windscreen of police car in London
Large crowd cheer him on and film incident on mobile phoneswww.standard.co.uk
Is there no hair thin enough that you won't split
That's great but they seemed to of given this one a free pass
Shocking moment teenage vandal breaks windscreen of police car in London
Large crowd cheer him on and film incident on mobile phones
www.standard.co.uk
You don't like homes for children in care having TVs?
Last edited:
Would you be up for watching Syrian TV if you were a refugee in Syria?
It would depend on how good it is. Have they got anything like Emmerdale Farm?
Kent country Council.are not paying for TV licenses, central govt are.
No hair splitting, just a lie
And claiming its tv licenses to asylum seekers is a completely false impression, when it's going to children in care for group use.
Are you going to admit it a total misrepresentation of facts, not splitting hairs
Why are you so immature?Right - because that is exactly what I said
You are notch,s son and I claim my £10
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,802
- Reaction score
- 5,345
- Country
And Labour have increased them.
I suspect you haven't even bothered looking at them
So lower paid people need more skills. Do you think the high paid should just take a pay cut via tax, so that the low paid can be subsidised?
A bit less top heavy would be a nice start.
The market rates of low paid people are not determined by their skill levels. The market rates of high paid people are not determined by their skill level.
The way it currently works, low paid people are paid less, so the high paid can take more.
When low paid workers are given state benefits, it is the employer who is subsidised, enabling them to pay workers less than a living wage.
When Amazon workers have to **** in a bottle, because they are not allowed time to use a lavatory, or have miscarriages in a washroom, because they are not allowed time for medical appointments, the oppression of the poor is performed to funnel more money to the rich.
Billionaires hate workers rights, and unions that work for them.
Bezos doesn't want wedding presents. What do you give the man who has everything?
A tax bill would be a start.
Similar threads
