Stock market dealing

I’m with Hargreaves Lansdowne .
Used AI to give me top performers in the various fields and then put £500 in 10 of them .
Not sure how often I should be checking them , looking for mid to long term growth.
 
HL is ok. A bit expensive on the holding fee at 0.45% but it's soon reducing to 0.35.

What you did is sensible.
The only variation I would have suggested, but probably not actually bothered to do (!) is to buy half of each to start with, in case one goes ti tsup.
Let me know what you have and I can squeal If I see something.

There will be lots of wrinkles to learn.
One is that you have to order by 8 a.m if you want to buy or sell something that day. Sometimes they "submit" before thea 8am, sometimes a bit later. After that time you can't cancel.
One thing you may not have found yet is the Portfolio analysis tool. It's very good and my other platforms don't have it.
You can easily add another fund tp the graph to see what would have happened, etc.

Two you might want to compare with, if you don't have them in your 5, are
Artemis Global Income
Barings South Korea
For the tech sector the one I found best is Polar Capital Glocal Tech Hedged. It's an "offshore" fund, Ireland. Lots are.

HL's screener is pretty useless, because it only goes down to 3 months. Yry the one at AJ Bell. The main funds are at HL as well.

Silver and Gold took a hit today when Scott Bessant said something minor - their prices are fragile, so I got out of most of them. Everyone's waiting for a sizeable pullback, though they may well go back up after. Kept some gold.

Silver IS in short supply, but AI thought 20% of the price was speculator's effect, so it's fickle.
 
Currently have these.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2582.jpeg
    IMG_2582.jpeg
    48.4 KB · Views: 22
  • IMG_2581.jpeg
    IMG_2581.jpeg
    114.1 KB · Views: 25
I’m with Hargreaves Lansdowne .
Used AI to give me top performers in the various fields and then put £500 in 10 of them .
Not sure how often I should be checking them , looking for mid to long term growth.
Investing is not the same as dealing,

For a long term investment in a pooled fund, once a year is plenty. If you don't trust the fund enough to do do that, find one you do trust.

Some people say you should not look at them for 20 years.

Though last years top performer is unlikely to be top performer in ten years time.

You can be sure that an investment with high charges will do worse than a similar one with low charges.

Investments tend to revert to the mean. Short term fluctuations make people look like stars by sheer chance. If you ever want to win a competition for imaginary investment performance, pick lots of high-risk off the wall ideas. Most of them will crash and burn. One might rise like a rocket. You won't find out which until too late. This trick is often used by people who aren't investing their own money, but take a big slice off the mug punters. If you did that with your own money, chances are you would end up penniless.
 
Those attitudes live under a bowler hat, supported by an umbrella.

Times have changed since the 1950's.

Do you drive according to the road and its conditions, or do you set a speed which you decide is "safe" and be satisfied with that? If you want to go about the country at 20mph because it's unlikely to get you injured, fine, go with that advice. Happy holidays.

Some of it is very obviously rubbish:
You can be sure that an investment with high charges will do worse than a similar one with low charges.
One with a higher return will always beat one whose return is lower regardless of charges, because returns overwhelm charges.

It isn't clever to quote and rely on some bloody fool just because he's using "well astablished" advice which he will claim has been true since 70 years ago. The same sort who would tell yo uthat it's not something to worry your little head about.
"Just invest in the S&P 500" is one such silly trope. Sure it has gone up overall if you take a long enough timescale.
It went up 8% in the last 12 months. If you'd bought it at the wrong time and wanted to sell, you'd have lost 18%.
Ah but your fees would have been low so that makes it OK, ???
Someone paying a little attention would have got a multiple of that 8%.
For a long term investment in a pooled fund, once a year is plenty. If you don't trust the fund enough to do do that, find one you do trust.
The S&P 500 is the best companies in the world, a pooled fund if there ever was one. How are you supposed to know which pooled fund will be OK for a year?

Every statement in that post looks like trolling spam and should be treated as such.
 
Last edited:
I’m with Hargreaves Lansdowne .
Used AI to give me top performers in the various fields and then put £500 in 10 of them .
Not sure how often I should be checking them , looking for mid to long term growth.

This is quite sensible.

 
Right, I had a chance to look them up.
AI picked those? I wonder why.
I'm assuming this isn't ALL your savings. And I'm assuming you ARE prepared to look at and change things if necessary, looking say every 3-4 weeks or more often. It'll be on your phone. I keep most of my funds at least a month, some near a year. If you switch too often you have a period of nothing. How keen you'd be to get out if you saw them drop, is a difficulty we all have. It's easy to do nothing. If you aim to sell and rebuy, you'll get both timings wrong.
See if you can find out what others think about the chances of recovery if something dips. If you sell and wish you hadn't, you DID avoid the risk of the stock going down further, which is worth something. Gold, say, could dip and keep dipping. Have a limit, 10% or something - up to you, and stick to it - get out at that level

I wouldn't pick many of them, tbh.
- The Artemis smart Garp funds are pretty good in their sector.
- You have two gold/silver ones. They'll be about the same as each other.
- The three Multi-asset ones will be very similar to each other too. The ones from the same company will be almost identical.

Your AI doesn't seem to have sought much diversification or looked at last year's results.
History doesn't repeat, but it rhymes.
Stocks' behaviours do NOT revert to the mean of each other.
Crap last year is fairly likely to be crap again.

1769728362066.png


Orange and grey earned you nothing - maybe dividends, I chose the non divi paying versions (That's what Acc means).
Smart GARP UK. Why? Smart Garp Europe did better. Both performed pretty well. Your UK one (yellow) is the best performer you have.
Smart Garp global was a bit under.
But that Artemis Global Income I'm using is actively managed, better diversified, and did particularly well in the last month. Whatever is in its mix, it's doing well recently.
Multi asset funds are always sort of boring, 10% or so.
The gold funds got 180% in the last year

DIversification is ok if you don't know where to put your money, Warren Buffet says.
Best fund in its sector could be a wise choice, but that's not what you've got

Your gold and silver will, at recent performance, overwhelm most of the others,. They also might give you a choppy ride. They might well take a hit in the next couple of days.
Governments have been buying gold. If a big buyer has enough and stops, the price could dip. 20%, 30%, have happened in the past. Did you look that up?
Using well-performing funds with basically just one asset in them, could hurt you.
If you "dollar cost averaged" (look that up" your way in, you could expect to get a good sum built up so a 30% hit wouldn't hurt much relative to what you started with.

The multi asset funds aren't ever particularly "good" -they match the SPY pretty much.
At 10% though, you could find something like a Corporate bond or Strategic bond which is NOT related to company prices. they get their money from loan interest. SImilar return, real diversity.
Real Estate, isn't usually something you'd want to hold for long.

You've missed out on Asia Pacific, specifically Korea. It's on fire.
"Emerging Markets" funds would get you a slice of that. They all do well when the dollar drops, and Trump is busy slashing it.

SO you have a strange bunch, in may ways.

A word on diversification.
Bowler hatters often go nuts on diversification. They seem to think there's merit in having stocks which never move.
If you can diversify into unrelated funds which all return about the same, great. At the moment, that might be Korea, Gold , (maybe gas/ Oil for a shortish spell if Trump gets sillier.
Brazil has been doing well and so on.
You'd have to be quick and careful using those though.
There are decent reasons to expect Korea to do well for a period.

If you're using gold, it has been doing so well that it overwhelms at least two of the funds in your mix. There's no point having the weak ones, unless this is ALL your savings. Never put all your savings in one place, use Fixed interest, property etc
In this account the 180% from the golds overwhelms the 0 and 10% returns.
So decide whether it's a long - term leave , or a punt.
If the latter, lets behave as though the pattern continues for a while, but be cautious.

Perhaps:
Start with a couple or three of the 40% or better per annum funds - there are many of those. Look at the Screener at AJBell.
Then buy say some gold, some Korea, perhaps 5% of each if they're doing better. Each month, ease your way into the better payers.
Once you have built up enough, you will be able to afford that dreaded 30% hit, so you can stay all-in them.
Your nerves may take over, then.

Use any warning you have about the best returners beginning to fail, because they may do so at a rapid rate, and it will take you a couple of days to realise and get your funds out. You can't set stop-losses. If they go flat, sell and hold.

Edit: I see the metals are dropping a couple or more percent today.
This is where you realise the difference that some like to invent between investing and trading. It's just about the timing.
 
Ouch if you're stuck in SIlver - so far down 30% today.
Luckily mine was mostly in an ETF so I was using stop-losses.

Still lost a few thou on it, but that's maybe 5% of what it has made in the last month.
I've been aggressively "shorting" ( make a profit when the price goes down) on a leveraged platform to hedge the direction - no real idea how I'll come out yet

Did you get caught @foxhole ?

If so, it's hard to know what to suggest. Sell half is one common move, then if it retraces back up or goes on down, it could have been worse...
 
Last edited:
No silver investments, some minor ups and downs but still up overall .
I chose the stocks just used AI for a list of top performers .
Around 20% of my investments , have cash ISA and also my private pension but I don’t manage that .
 
Gold is down 12.5%, and you do have a silver input, Blackrock G & G has miners who produce silver too, iirc.
You don't see the full effect until the day or two after. Lets hope it pulls back a bit.

just used AI for a list of top performers .
So how did it get two which returned nothing last year?! It didn't get you top performers!.

When I was looking after my wife's millions, I put most in stodgy bondy things which got 10 - 20%, then a percentage in Artemis Global Income which turned out to get 50% in the year, and a small amount in something(s) "hot". At the moment that would be Barings Korea.
Your US Advantage fund has been going south for the past 3 months, and your Real Estate is useless to you!

I'd put a bit in Asia Pacific, specifically that Korea. Some in Emerging Markets possibly (the one I chose focuses on the best companies therein) South America is doing quite well, and traditionally US or Global Tech does well, when sentiment is good, like it is now.
Gold and silver have probably had their best run. They'll probably settle into a slower uptrend, there are still shortages of silver and copper.

The daily percentages HL gives you are useful. For about 5% pa, you only need 0.02% per day.

Th stodgy bondy things aren't returning as much now because interest rates have fallen, but they still beat inflation easily and aren't susceptible to Elon's Gurning - or Trump's.

I quite liked the green one, which WAS up at 20%. Note how the bond derived funds didn't collapse in April when Trump got his scoreboard out.
Grey took 6 months to recover.
1769811900087.png
 
If you are an investor with a 5 to 10 year horizon, not a day trader, then a speculative holding with a 12 month return of a 60% or 145% rise is satisfactory, and you should not fret over the day to day ups and downs. I am of course thinking of gold and silver.

You might, however, take a view on how long the trend will last, and when it is time to get out. You might think it is better to get out a bit too early than a bit too late. Sometimes you will be wrong. You might think that excessive volatility does not fit into your strategy.
 
If you are an investor with a 5 to 10 year horizon, not a day trader, then a speculative holding with a 12 month return of a 60% or 145% rise is satisfactory,
Obviously. Everyone needs to realise though that there is no virtue in calling yourself an "investor".
If it means buy and forget, then Investor means dumb.

Gold and silver are likely to have very large drops, or "draw downs" as they get called. Silver has just dropped 37%. Gold 16%, peak.
Hence the suggestion of "DCA-ing" in.
To buy for long term at even 20% of your pot is asking for trouble.

Some of the increase in silver's price recently is due to supply/industrial demand, but some is pure speculation. Estimates run around 20% for the latter.
For gold, there isn't much being "used", it's getting bought at the mo by some large countries, which could stop without their letting us know.
So buying it now, or when it's particularly high, is a riskier strategy you need.
The gold price is quite likely to stay dropped well back for a considerable time, 6 months say, then go flat, which is worth avoiding.

This isn't "fretting about day to day downs", it's a loss of a quarter or more of your investment overnight, depending on the precise fund allocation. Not something to be glib over.

Investing we can say is long term and Trading short term, but they're the same thing, just different time preriods.
Again, I say that the notion of buying something for 5 or 10 years and not reacting at all, is plain dumb.
These days there's no excuse for doing that if you're interested in improving your gains. A sector might stay amongst the best for a year, but it's not all that common. You can't buy something and expect to be fine for a year, and there's no need to.

Usually I don't hold cfd leveraged positions overnight, but you can; stop losses work the same. The 3x ETFs can be ok but are quite risky due to spreads and flaky stopouts. I must have had a rush of blood to the head last weekend - I held over and it worked.

I just looked back at Forbes' prediction for 2025, which wasn't spectacularly accurate.
Now, we have things like this
"JPMorgan analysts added they see gold futures currently overbought, while silver futures are currently very overbought, and bitcoin futures are oversold, adding that gold has recently shown “more robust liquidity and market breadth” than either silver or bitcoin.
“This raises the risk of profit taking or mean reversion in both gold and silver over the near term,” JPMorgan analysts said."

Bitcoin, MAY be a beneficiary of a "rotation" in fund allocations, which could be huge.

I drastically reduced my gold holdings recently, as posted last week or so, and held it where a stop loss worked, so lost a small % (I'm still holding some) compared with the rise of the previous months. Gold dips have previously lasted many weeks, so I'll see where it goes.
Selling rather than holding I would say was the right thing to do, because we don't know where the price is going, and if Iose out compared with holding, then the loss in profit is insurance against a big drop, and that's fine.

Day buying/selling vs long term buying/selling isn't an either-or.
Friday I was short silver and gold all day in CFD. Gold at 20:1, sold at about 5400 and bought back at 4800. "Everyone" was doing the same. So don't try to pour scorn on people using the short - term movements.
Do the maths, the profit you get doing that is (600/5400) x20=~2.2 so start with £10 and end with £32.
Ending the day at 3.2x beats the hell out of your leave-it-there-long-term-investment of starting with £10 and ending with £8.88, regardless of what comes later.

If you're convinced, you can find somewhere which doesn't charge much for "overnight", say base plus 3%, use a margin of say 10k. That gives you 200k, and if it goes up long term you're fine, as long as the price doesn't dip, because you'd get a "margin call" and have to sell at a big loss.
 
I chose the stocks just used AI for a list of top performers .
WHich AI did you use and what question exactly, because it didn't work.
They often get things wrong, still.
I've found Perplexity is best for SM.

What I thought you might have meant, is that you asked forthe best performersin your 10 SECTORS. There are 11 recognised sectors in the S&P500
Those are all inthe S&P500 though, which excludes the rest of the world!.

I posted this before. You will see that some sectors, like Tech, tend to do well but Energy doesn't, unless it really does, as in 2021/22.
If you stuck to whatever portfolio you had been using, through that period, you would again, be pretty dumb.

Hargreaves Lansdown happens to be good at charting. Using their fund selector you can pick sectors. Their web page for doing that is a bit odd, get used to it! They have a different one for stocks and most etf's. Grr
1769908684387.png


Apart from the purple top one, those are some sector averages. They'd have together got you 15% or so, but not the 50%.
That same AGI fund won't stay at the same rate necessarily, so you watch and swap when appropriate.

If you ask AI which funds at HL in each of the main sectors has done best over the last year, you should do better, but I just asked it, and the answers were HOPELESS! Usa a screener - even HL's will do.
 
Back
Top