lol, how DARE you poke fun at this amazing, robust scheme that will not deliver.
The Bell hotel. Looks like it’s set a precedent.
- Thread starter Mottie
- Start date
Confused thinking
Blair period was EU freedom of movement, ie legal migration
Tories continued that because there was no choice, it’s part of the Single Market
I guess you mean the increases post 2019 which were a result of Johnson’s student visa policy.
asylum seekers are a different issue
How did the Conservatives do…..
Oh they had the Rwanda scheme:
Cost = £800 million
Number of people sent to Rwanda = 0
It is the first ever deal agreed with France.
It has the potential to act as a deterrent…..because a person who paid a lot of money to a people smuggler arrives in U.K. and gets detained then returned to France.
The asylum seekers that France will swap will be ones chosen on the basis of having a valid reason: for example Afghanis who worked with British military.
Motorbiking does not seem to understand the ones returned to France are not of the same group as the ones chosen for the swap.
I guess the detail is a bit much for Reform party supporters
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,807
- Reaction score
- 5,351
- Country
France has not agreed to prevent those returning from illegally crossing again.
So last week we had some 2,000+ coming here illegally. Under the returns deal up to 50 could be sent back, in exchange another fresh 50, would be sent, while the original 50 sent back are free to try their luck again.
It's not me who doesn't understand it.
it would be a deterrent if France wasn't such a bad place to be sent to and you weren't free to try your luck again.
Reform party have no solutions
“Tow boats back to France” they say -that won’t work
“Leave ECHR” they say -that wont work
“Pushbacks” they say - not legal, not a solution
“Deport all illegals” - but Reform don’t explain how they would do that given it needs agreement.
Conservatives had no solutions
Labour are getting on with the job
“Tow boats back to France” they say -that won’t work
“Leave ECHR” they say -that wont work
“Pushbacks” they say - not legal, not a solution
“Deport all illegals” - but Reform don’t explain how they would do that given it needs agreement.
Conservatives had no solutions
Labour are getting on with the job
An island border, is much easier to defend than a land border.
Looks like Kemi has jumped on the bandwagon now and is urging conservative councils to do the same. I wonder how long before Labour see the light?
www.bbc.co.uk
Tory councils should consider asylum hotel challenges, says Badenoch
The Tory leader writes to council leaders after a court blocked a hotel from housing asylum seekers.
www.bbc.co.uk
Approx £1billion just on accomodation.
Hate to think what the true figure is when you take into account everything else
Hate to think what the true figure is when you take into account everything else
- Joined
- 22 Aug 2006
- Messages
- 7,054
- Reaction score
- 1,174
- Country
Big Brit ships mid channel to stop them entering, phone up frog lifeboats to come and get them. They're in frog waters.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,807
- Reaction score
- 5,351
- Country
NotchyFacts™
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,807
- Reaction score
- 5,351
- Country
Bournemouth: The seaside town 'changed' by immigration - where non-British-born population rose nearly 50%
For decades, Britain has wrestled with the thorny issue of migration. In recent weeks, Bournemouth – like many other places - have seen these hotels become the focal point for people angry about immigration in the UK.
Two Labour-run councils 'considering all options' to challenge migrant hotel use
Wirral and Tamworth council leaders say they are exploring their options after a Conservative-run council in Essex won an interim High Court injunction to stop migrants being accommodated at a local hotel.
