This went under the radar

[motorbiking]

So the wife of a councillor did not understand the offence or could not afford legal representation?
So she pled guilty?

Again, why did she plead guilty if she wasn't.

Or was it an acceptance that she knew she was guilty and didn't try to worsen her case, under advice.

We all knew (well most of us) that she was.

You need to ask her.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

You need to ask her.

I'd hazard a guess she and her advisers knew she was guilty and it was better not to argue it.

I'd have thought as a "legal specialist" you'd have suggested that.

 

[Odds]

Ahh right you still don’t get it.

It's already been explained to you - try another thread.

 

[denso13]

I'd hazard a guess she and her advisers knew she was guilty and it was better not to argue it.

Of course she is guilty. Just froth and nonsense from the "what if" brigade.

 

[noseall]

Precisely. She was not sentenced for "not caring".

Correct, even roast knows it too. He's pretending not to understand what was written.

 

[denso13]

it is more clear that she is calling for an attack on the "treacherous government and politicians". but she does not appear to have been convicted of that.

"Lucy Connolly you have pleaded guilty to the offence of distributing material with the intention of stirring up racial hatred."

Cat A case, hook, line and sinker.

 

[motorbiking]

I'd hazard a guess..

Yes you can guess.

Do you think her legal advisors also told her the stupidity of discussing the case and her motive in a messenger group?

Or perhaps she was too stupid. It certainly seems that she wasn’t very bright.

 

[aveatry]

Under starmer she is jailed for 31 months for inciting an attack, I wonder how long someone would get for an actual attack an assault by beating and criminal damage - on lets say a now elected politician

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Under starmer she is jailed for 31 months for inciting an attack, I wonder how long someone would get for an actual attack an assault by beating and criminal damage - on lets say a now elected politician

Endangering life?

Doesn't excuse any attack, but get the full, comparative facts in place too.

 

[motorbiking]

I think he’s referring to the woman who has just pleaded guilty to assaulting good old Nige.

Suspended sentence would be my guess. But she won’t get much discount for an early guilty plea switching at the start of the trial.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

I think he’s referring to the woman who has just pleaded guilty to assaulting good old Nige.

Suspended sentence would be my guess. But she won’t get much discount for an early guilty plea switching at the start of the trial.

So an event that needs court and punishment, but not the same at all.

 

[noseall]

Suspended sentence would be my guess

She deserves it. I don't agree with what she did at all. The fact that this time it was a milkshake, is irrelevant.

 

[JohnD]

Under starmer she is jailed for 31 months

Let me just check what you are trying to do.

Are you suggesting that the Prime Minister of the day creates sentencing policy? Or appoints judges who will obey his instructions? Or enacted the existing laws that are being upheld? And somehow achieved all that in the last few months?

 

[ReganAndCarter]

When they choose on who to visit violence, according to their own ideology, they become those who would do us harm.

Absolute nonsense. Of course the police choose on who to visit violence. It's often a split second decision to safeguard themselves or other innocent parties.

Otherwise, why do you think they carry a truncheon or batton?

I'm amazed at how a simple quote that most others seem to understand is beyond your comprehension.

You do talk some utter twaddle!

 

[ReganAndCarter]

ah yes the Farage riots

"we dont like foreigners so we go out and injure white British police"

It's a quote from the 1940s. But don't let me stop your imagination running away with itself, Notchy