- Joined
- 25 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 2,813
- Reaction score
- 681
- Country

Dacia - Romanian Renault.Dacia


Dacia - Romanian Renault.Dacia
The chain conversion sounds interesting. I had my wet belt changed under the recall and the changed the recommended interval from 12 to 6 years because of the rubber belt issue, one of the reasons I brought that car was because of the 12 year change. So at my next change I should have to option of a chain instead then.Remember that many wet belt engines also utilise a wet belt for their oil pump drive..this can also fail and is not always changed.
The Puretec engines used on many Stellantis group cars now have a chain conversion kit that hopefully solves the problems for the remaining cars life...although it's only just been released and chain tensioners can be another whole source if trouble.
Wow.. thanks for that! Been swatting up on wet belts. Flippin heck .. who designs these flipping things.
yet another climate "ting" - feel scammed yet.Manufacturers who are absolutely desperate for any CO2 reduction they can get, or risk getting fined £11k per gramme of CO2 over their target per vehicle sold!
yet another climate "ting" - feel scammed yet.
Also the 3 cylinder cars with Eco low friction piston rings are known to start burning oil after about 40k miles - very eco
I dislike small, overstressed engines. Unfortunately it's what our 'leaders' are forcing on us these days. Hired a Clio last year with 3 cylinder engine. It was ok on the flat, but hills needed planning.
The thing I enjoy most about our old, dirty, Golf diesel is when I’m driving down the lanes and one of the many cycling gangs deliberately ride three or four abreast to make it difficult to overtake, when the opportunity to overtake does come, I absolutely floor it in second gear and choke the bastards with diesel soot. Lots of it too.![]()
Neither does mine.Lucky you, mine never makes a trace of any smoke.
I dislike small, overstressed engines. Unfortunately it's what our 'leaders' are forcing on us these days. Hired a Clio last year with 3 cylinder engine. It was ok on the flat, but hills needed planning. Too much cog swapping for my liking. Still, at least they knew better than to try to palm me off with a battery driveway appliance. Afterwards I was glad to get back into my ancient oil burner van. Feel the torque, baby!


Since the turbo is driven by the speed of the exhaust gases, what you say could be theoretically correct, but likely false in practice. Engineers will want to get the power available asap, especially with such a small engine as yours, so it sounds like a poor design. Some engines are now using a small electric fan ( like in a computer ) which can spin up to 100 000 rpm in a second or two, to bridge the time until the full-size exhaust-turbo can accelerate to full speed.I have the purtech 1.2 turbo engine and understood that it does not kick in until higher revs. Have I got that wrong.

I think you are absolutely wrong there. "Peak oil" has been proven to be wrong numerous times.If the climate change arguments weren't enough on their own, there's still the inescapable fact that there's less and less oil each year, and what's left, is increasingly concentrated in the hands of some rather nasty political regimes who don't like us very much.

One day, my child, you will see the light!I dislike small, overstressed engines. Unfortunately it's what our 'leaders' are forcing on us these days. Hired a Clio last year with 3 cylinder engine. It was ok on the flat, but hills needed planning. Too much cog swapping for my liking. Still, at least they knew better than to try to palm me off with a battery driveway appliance. Afterwards I was glad to get back into my ancient oil burner van. Feel the torque, baby!![]()