- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,909
- Reaction score
- 3,073
- Country



According to you 88% is not a majority - you said so.according to you light speed is impossible - the maths says so..![]()
Einstein spent a decade developing general relativity, having concluded his work on special relativity had gaps.

88% of irrelevant data you mean.According to you 88% is not a majority - you said so.![]()
88% of irrelevant data you mean.

It's actually quite funny that people are trying to disprove Einstein and prefer the intricacies of Hawking. I've got a tear in my eye, well done DIYnot.Also we can all think like geniuses, It isn't that difficult.


except they aren't - you are just trolling.It's actually quite funny that people are trying to disprove Einstein and prefer the intricacies of Hawking. I've got a tear in my eye, well done DIYnot.
back on topic - Faster than light speed is not a pre-requisite to interstellar travel.

then watch the video, I will take it you will be apologising?It's actually quite funny that people are trying to disprove Einstein and prefer the intricacies of Hawking. I've got a tear in my eye, well done DIYnot.
Being able to live until you are 70'000+ years old would be a boon. If only they made spaceships to last a wee bit longer....Faster than light speed is not a pre-requisite to interstellar travel.

How fast are we taking? Lets check those numbers.Being able to live until you are 70'000+ years old would be a boon. If only they made spaceships to last a wee bit longer....![]()
Correct. The vacuum of space expanded fast - whoopee. And then matter followed a billion years later.Yes, he postulates that the fabric of spacetime expanded faster than the speed of light. He confirmed that objects, data, humans, etc., cannot. It's impossible.