D
Deleted member 317777
Oh so YouTube doesn’t count.
That’s very handy for you! Lol
UFO / UAP
- Thread starter Koolpc
- Start date
- Status
That’s very handy for you! Lol
D
Deleted member 317777
Gathering 'concrete' evidence
MIT class explores controversial pyramid theory with scale model
news.mit.edu
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
Great, the Egyptians perhaps used concrete. No issues with that.Oh so YouTube doesn’t count.
That’s very handy for you! Lol
D
Deleted member 317777
D
Deleted member 317777
It’s not concrete you sausage
But it does prove that thinking outside of the box is almost impossible to get funding for, and any papers past a peer review “See MIT article”
Which shows, it’s only theories that suit the people with money make it!!
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
Plausible, just reinforces the Egyptian possibilities.Gathering 'concrete' evidence
MIT class explores controversial pyramid theory with scale model
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
"The materials and know-how needed to cast the pyramids' giant 2-1/2 ton blocks in place, rather than quarrying and moving blocks of solid limestone, was definitely available to the Egyptians"Gathering 'concrete' evidence
MIT class explores controversial pyramid theory with scale model
Sounds plausible.
D
Deleted member 317777
I’m glad you agree with MIT.
It shows how hard it is to get any new research done and the new research won’t make it past a peer review.
A bit like a private club!
And yet we know where the stone comes, the Muqattam Formation matches the limestone of the Giza pyramids. It's low quality stone, which is likely to have influenced them building pyramids, rather than temples or some other fancy structure with pillars that were built elsewhere from better quality stone.Oh so YouTube doesn’t count.
That’s very handy for you! Lol
Stratigraphy of limestone applied to the Great Pyramid of Giza - Geoscience.blog
Okay, so the Great Pyramid of Giza. We all know it's impressive, right? But it's way more than just a big pile of rocks. It's a carefully built monument, and
geoscience.blog
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 317777
What’s your point ?And yet we know where the stone comes, the Muqattam Formation matches the limestone of the Giza pyramids. It's low quality stone, which is likely to have influenced them building pyramids, rather than temples or some other fancy structure with pillars that were built elsewhere from better quality stone.
Stratigraphy of limestone applied to the Great Pyramid of Giza - Geoscience.blog
Okay, so the Great Pyramid of Giza. We all know it's impressive, right? But it's way more than just a big pile of rocks. It's a carefully built monument, and
Gathering 'concrete' evidence
MIT class explores controversial pyramid theory with scale model
Now that would be a practical possibility.
D
Deleted member 317777
Roman concrete was another good example of ancient construction.
But it still doesn’t explain how massive stone were moved 100’s of miles.
And that’s just a start
That most stone comes from a known source, that it largely dictated what they built there.
D
Deleted member 317777
Colossi of Memnon - Wikipedia
Transported over 400 miles over land.
- Status
