Hi all,
Not sure if this is the best place to post this, but I hope so!
We had some damproofing work done back in early 2009, which involved removing plaster from a bunch of walls, drilling, injecting stuff and replastering.
Apart from the fact that replastering was straight as a boomerang (we'll ignore that one!), we've recently discovered that around half the walls which were damp-proofed were actually sitting on floorboards, with a fairly high crawlspace underneath, and they were running perpendicular to the walls in the crawlspace. Doesn't this mean that rising damp in these walls is pretty much impossible, and so we've been charged for blatantly unecessary work?
Or was it our responsibility to check that the work was required before allowing the damp proofing company concerned to proceed?
Thanks in advance,
Russ
Not sure if this is the best place to post this, but I hope so!
We had some damproofing work done back in early 2009, which involved removing plaster from a bunch of walls, drilling, injecting stuff and replastering.
Apart from the fact that replastering was straight as a boomerang (we'll ignore that one!), we've recently discovered that around half the walls which were damp-proofed were actually sitting on floorboards, with a fairly high crawlspace underneath, and they were running perpendicular to the walls in the crawlspace. Doesn't this mean that rising damp in these walls is pretty much impossible, and so we've been charged for blatantly unecessary work?
Or was it our responsibility to check that the work was required before allowing the damp proofing company concerned to proceed?
Thanks in advance,
Russ