D
durhamplumber
No ...But I suggest that is your impression.Certainly the one you give.
Was government advised to lockdown earlier?
- Thread starter Notch7
- Start date
Sponsored Links
As always trying to have it both ways when caught out spouting b ollox...
At least you're consistent
D
Deleted2797112
E
EddieM
What does it mean, new deaths? Because as tragic as 1 death is, the UK doesn't have as many deaths as the rest of Europe or indeed the EU combined, by any measure.
Sponsored Links
I refer you to the topic title...
"Was government advised to lockdown earlier?"
If it was and failed to act then the UK has trailed behind the rest of Europe and we are now playing catch up which will have far greater consequences...
Because it's easier to get back up and running with the cooperation of a group of 30 countries rather than being on your own!
hilarious.
Ceres thinks a government advisory group is devoid of political interference.
This is an advisory group where the govts senior advisor sat in on meetings. A govt advisor that even the PM cant sack.
did you fall down in the last shower
D
Deleted2797112
You're lying again Notchy.
If you want to see which of the membership attended each meeting, read the minutes, attendance of participants and observers is provided at the end.
And if you read the minutes, you'll see that the advisers advise based on their understanding of the science. There is no political interference. They provide advice to the Government and the Government decides what to do with it.
I seem to have lost the SAGE consensus reports ceres. Pity as those are what the gov say they follow. As gov have said take a lot of scientists and opinions will vary. I'd assume the chairman would establish what that consensus is. Just as Boris should in cabinet meetings. Some PM's have bent that to suite.
Cummins. The SAGE virus mapper is talking pretty openly such as yes an earlier lock down would have reduced deaths. When asked about Cummins he said all he did was ask for clarification on some points. He was asked specifically about interference.
Just as Boris should in cabinet meetings. Some PM's have bent that to suite.Cummins. The SAGE virus mapper is talking pretty openly such as yes an earlier lock down would have reduced deaths. When asked about Cummins he said all he did was ask for clarification on some points. He was asked specifically about interference.
This the lock down consensus
https://assets.publishing.service.g...w-on-behavioural-and-social-interventions.pdf
https://assets.publishing.service.g...w-on-behavioural-and-social-interventions.pdf
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2018
- Messages
- 523
- Reaction score
- 105
- Country
The Government can't be expected to take the advise of a single person from the SAGE committee they have to take it from the overall, collective advice from the SAGE committee. Steven Riley is a just one of the members, I can't actually post the rest of the committees names because of the 1000 character limit.
D
Deleted2797112
That's not the 2 March consensus.
The 27 countries weren't helping each other much at the beginning, Germany refusing PPE to Italy, France having burned their PPE to save storage costs resorting to hijacking lorries of it bound for the UK. LMAO.
There is no signs of a consensus on the 2nd Mar. A consensus is not a report. The graph in this one is of interest - see comment about Autumn
https://assets.publishing.service.g...ntions-on-an-epidemic-of-covid-19-in-uk-1.pdf
I'm pretty sure the same graph is also shown in an earlier one.
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 2,771
- Reaction score
- 574
- Country
the problem is with this government (probably all governments all over the world) they tell lies so often it is difficult to form any opinion on anything they do. We have no idea how many people have died or when they died. We seem to be in a bigger shambles than other countries, but may be they are just better liars
Spain is an interesting one, they had terrible figures, then they decided they needed to get tourism up and running, all of a sudden 2000+ people come back to life and their daily death rate went from 200+ per day to 1.
Spain is an interesting one, they had terrible figures, then they decided they needed to get tourism up and running, all of a sudden 2000+ people come back to life and their daily death rate went from 200+ per day to 1.
D
Deleted2797112
What you have linked to is only a statement on behavioural interventions, not the full COVID-19 nine yards:
https://assets.publishing.service.g...ment-on-2019-novel-coronavirus-_covid-19_.pdf
Sponsored Links
