That all sounds credible, given the behaviour of the forum software. Given that you clearly have now seen the post you were accused of 'ducking', I presume that others must be waiting with bated breath for your replyWhilst I was typing it, you added post #29. But when I clicked Post Reply, what I saw was a page ending with #28 followed by my reply. But because my reply was posted after #29, the system seems to assume I must have seen #29, mine became #30, and when I visited the thread subsequently I was taken to p3 on account of that assumption, so I never saw the post which you are "accusing" me of "ducking".
Kind Regards, John