


More twaddle.The monarchy is there to kick out this occupation government and run it into the sea. It had better get on with it.

ExactlyThe monarchy is there to kick out this occupation government and run it into the sea. It had better get on with it.


It's small beer compared to the likes of Musk, Zuckerberg and Bezos.
What people complain about is the inherited wealth.
It's a two-way street, i'd say. The Sovereign Grant is a legacy from the days of yore, Charles II i think, who negotiated a way to work with parliament and accept funding with the HoC after the Glorious Revolution restored the monarchy. We live with this legacy and accept the pros and cons of such an arrangement because the United Kingdom is recognised around the world as a constitutional monarchy. Without them i think the break-up of the UK is much more likely and i don't think for a moment we'd get our money's worth from a republic.And the avoidance of tax.
If they bring in so much money, why do they need our handouts

The King is more “British” than Far age imo, .
Yes, but not by much and it's dropping over timeMore people love the royals than not, all the foreign leaders love a state visit and nobody does one like our royals....we are a hard act to follow.... FACT
Is anyone planning for them to be exiled? They can just be cut out of any role in government and be subject to the same laws as the rest of us.If we abolished them how would we benefit? We wouldnt we'd all be more miserable with no royal weddings no more jubilees...
Sounds horrible doesnt it.

Why does it bother you?Is anyone planning for them to be exiled? They can just be cut out of any role in government and be subject to the same laws as the rest of us.

I doubt these people would more miserableIf we abolished them how would we benefit? We wouldnt we'd all be more miserable with no royal weddings no more jubilees...
Sounds horrible doesnt it.