Why would the thread entitled "a bit of bondage" be 'locked' on this forum?
Why would "a bit of bondage" be locked?
- Thread starter david911cockburn
- Start date
Sponsored Links
H
holmslaw
..
As I stated in another thread because right now you come across as a fool.
QUOTE
You will find that you will receive much warmer responses if you put some effort into posting clear concise questions or propositions and then follow through with reasonable interactive discussion. Your current approach makes it seem that you think you are some sort of guru posing profound clues to some underlying false axiom of our understanding of the laws of physics.
For heavens sake man, ask questions properly and follow up with something logical because you really come across as bl**dy stupid at the moment.
QUOTE
You will find that you will receive much warmer responses if you put some effort into posting clear concise questions or propositions and then follow through with reasonable interactive discussion. Your current approach makes it seem that you think you are some sort of guru posing profound clues to some underlying false axiom of our understanding of the laws of physics.
For heavens sake man, ask questions properly and follow up with something logical because you really come across as bl**dy stupid at the moment.
edit
Sponsored Links
Dunning–Kruger effect.
oi-oi cocky
I imagine you wouldn't accept 'because you are a boring troll and you were slowly destroying this forum with your delusional drivel' as a valid answer to your question, so-
Why do you think it was locked?
I imagine you wouldn't accept 'because you are a boring troll and you were slowly destroying this forum with your delusional drivel' as a valid answer to your question, so-
Why do you think it was locked?
So we are getting a little bit too close to the truth and you would rather not talk about it any more.
You will find that you will receive much warmer responses if you put some effort into posting clear concise questions or propositions and then follow through with reasonable interactive discussion. Your current approach makes it seem that you think you are some sort of guru posing profound clues to some underlying false axiom of our understanding of the laws of physics.
In the quote above:-
When you say 'we' who are you referring to?
When you say 'you' who are you referring to?
IMHO, someone who repeatedly posts drivel to a forum and receives no responses will not damage that forum. It takes far more than one person (and, yes, I was one of them) to tango a thread up to 31 pages
Kind Regards, John
Well, I don't know about others, but I have enough self-control to resist engaging with drivel even if I see it, without the need for push-button 'props' to protect me from temptation!
Kind Regards, John.
It appears that Mr. Sheds (in common with Mr. OMS from the IET forum), can only try to get people who disagree with them barred from the forums!
The usual tactic is to try to provoke an angry response, but this is something new.
The usual tactic is to try to provoke an angry response, but this is something new.
A bit like getting an honest review removed from Amazon!
Out of interest Have you found anyone who agrees with you Mr Cockburn?
are is everybody still wrong?
No-one is trying to get you barred. They are just advocating that people choose the 'Ignore' option if they want. You would still be at liberty to post on the forum, but people who have 'opted out' would no longer see your posts.
Please don't add paranoia to your already long list of failings, David.
DIYnot Local
Staff member
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local
Sponsored Links
