I don't understand how that affects what I said - can you explain?
Clues would be fine. If they prove to be beyond me, we can resort to hand feeding.
What I said was that, as far as considerations of disconnection times is concerned, I didn't think anyone could find a reg which would require a Zs lower than the maximum which would achieve the required disconnection times (the comment being discussed was, after all, 'Zs too high') ... and, as far as I am concerned, that remains true regardless of the Ze. Do you disagree?
That is not what you said. There really isn't any need to erroneously paraphrase that which can be seen above. It is clear what you did say.
John, unlike a verbal conversation where it is a bit easier to back track as its easier to fudge (due to the reliance upon the contemporaneous memories of the persons involved in the discussion) the actual conversation by saying something like' ah, but i didn't say that, i said this' or 'you must have mis-heard me when i said...', you have engaged in a written discussion. Therefore every comment (unless surreptitiously altered) remains to seen, and can be seen verbatim.
I have no desire to do that, do you?
Indeed, it is very clear what I did say, namely (with emboldening added):
In what sense did what I wrote subsequently represent an 'erroneous paraphrase' of the original?
Not really. I was talking about regulations concening disconnection times (and 'too high Zs'), but, for some reason, you introduced a comment ('clue') which I presume was meant to relate to PSC in the presence of very low Ze. I therefore thought that you perhaps wanted to discuss it.
Im sure there are many dwellings spread around the country which have a sub <23m away. Probably more so in urban areas/cities, wouldn't you agree?
I don't really see why you should find it unclear, but I'll try to spell it out for you (with some inevitable repetition, to help you understand):
... with the qualification "as far as that consideration [[i.e.disconnection times]] is concerned"-
I refer you to the my above-mentioned qualification to what I wrote. I agree with what you're saying about 'very very low' Zs, but that has nothing to do with what I said about disconnection times.
I really don't know - you tell me! It undoubtedly happens and, as use say, it's going to be more common in urban areas ... but not only urban. Even in my tiny, very rural, village, there is a sub-station immediately adjacent to one dwelling, so that is presumably going to be <23m cable for that dwelling, but I suspect that is the only dwelling that will have a cable run of less than 23m from that particular transformer.
I'm always playful, it gives me a great sense of well being and an inner warmth.
This is the first time you have included the 'i.e. disconnection times' bit. Up until now you seem to have been talking about the only consideration regarding Zs is to ensure dis. times are met, there is nothing more to consider. I put it to you that there is more to consider. I told you why. You didn't understand.
OK.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local
