I think the number of jurors should be reduced to six.
Blooming typos!!996 to go. Democracy is a democracy doesLook at your poll figure compared to the thread title.![]()
![]()
I see he doesn't do english.![]()
There must be a nice, fluffy, supportive forum out there somewhere for you martian.typical neanderthal "hate change" response.... back to what i said... it was a "half baked " idea to support how i felt.... It would need working on, it's certainly not finalised.... but as expected you muppet jump all over it... No wonder this country/ no, world.... is in such a state !!![]()
I think the number of jurors should be reduced to six.
Which one - six?? Maybe we need a voteI think the number of jurors should be reduced to six.
funny how no one picks up on this idea !!!
I think the number of jurors should be reduced to six.
funny how no one picks up on this idea !!!
I think the number of jurors should be reduced to six.
funny how no one picks up on this idea !!!
Because it's sensible.
oh yeah, what a good idea last magic bean up your arris !!![]()
![]()
![]()
Typing without due intelligence.![]()
Typing without due intelligence.![]()
Causing unnecessary suffering by stupidity.![]()
Mathematically, 12 is a sample at risk... 1000 is at much less risk - somebody said friends might influence it....
The idea is that you pick 1000 random people from around the world who can log on to the trial via the internet.... they get an hour to log their decision...