April Jones

[alumni]

But you did suggest they had the right man. How do you know.?
Same assumption you make elsewhere?

Are you f*cking mental. Read it back.

The Police are sure you f*ckwit.

I think it best you read your recent posts over last few days.

And for your information. Being arrested does not mean you are guilty (at least at the time of arrest), unless of course you cough up to the charge.

Now, do try and keep up.

 

[sooey]

What LMB has said is that he thinks that the police think that they've got the right man, not that he thinks that they have the right man. He doesn't know, nor do I, but I think that the police think that they've got the right man as well. That's not too hard to understand is it?

 

[LastMagicBean]

I think it best you read your recent posts over last few days.

No need, I wrote 'em.

Attempt to stay on topic FFS.

 

[LastMagicBean]

What LMB has said is that he thinks that the police think that they've got the right man, not that he thinks that they have the right man. He doesn't know, nor do I, but I think that the police think that they've got the right man as well. That's not too hard to understand is it?

He won't have it sooey.

 

[alumni]

That's not too hard to understand is it?

The logic you two witchunters have been applying recently is.

If it helps, in this particular case, it would seem they are confident. Does not mean caution should be cast aside though.

 

[sooey]

There is nothing wrong with our logic, it's you're inability to follow it that's the problem. Never mind.

 

[LastMagicBean]

The logic you two witchunters have been applying recently is.

If it helps, in this particular case, it would seem they are confident. Does not mean caution should be cast aside though.

Save me a place at your tea party, preferably between the Mad Hatter and the March Hare

 

[ellal]

I have already stated..if they have found DNA evidence then it's almost assured, that that was the vehicle used, either he the accused, is covering for someone else, or he knows something about it.

Wotan

'Almost assured'?

 

[wotan]

I have already stated..if they have found DNA evidence then it's almost assured, that that was the vehicle used, either he the accused, is covering for someone else, or he knows something about it.

Wotan

'Almost assured'?

Definately certain.

Wotan

 

[masona]

It's a mystery as to how they are able to charge him with murder in the absence of a body

It's rare but it's not the first time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_conviction_without_a_body

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Danielle_Jones

 

[ellal]

I have already stated..if they have found DNA evidence then it's almost assured, that that was the vehicle used, either he the accused, is covering for someone else, or he knows something about it.

Wotan

'Almost assured'?

Definately certain.

Wotan

'Almost assured', and now 'definately certain' all based on an 'if'?...

Best you get out there then with your pitchfork and apply some old fashioned 'justice'....

Meanwhile the more balanced ones will await the facts!

 

[wotan]

The truth will come out, it has to, speculating what happened till it does, is a very uncertain thing to do.

(my last words on the subject)

Wotan

 

[JohnD]

what was that woman who was murdered in her rented flat, and the press were convinced it was her landlord, because he had a key and looked like a wrong 'un?

turned out to be someone else.

But suppose it had been him, all the stuff in the press would have meant he might have appealed as a mistrial and got away with it.

 

[alumni]

what was that woman who was murdered in her rented flat, and the press were convinced it was her landlord, because he had a key and looked like a wrong 'un?

turned out to be someone else.

But suppose it had been him, all the stuff in the press would have meant he might have appealed as a mistrial and got away with it.

Already been mentioned in noted thread. The witchunters don't let detail like that get in the way though.

 

[sooey]

what was that woman who was murdered in her rented flat, and the press were convinced it was her landlord, because he had a key and looked like a wrong 'un?

turned out to be someone else.

But suppose it had been him, all the stuff in the press would have meant he might have appealed as a mistrial and got away with it.

Already been mentioned in noted thread. The witchunters don't let detail like that get in the way though.

That seems to be becoming a favourite phrase of yours, but if you are going to persist with it at least get it right.
It's witch hunter!