First of all, it appears that squeaky is trying to be the poster with the most, without actually making any comment at all! It begs the question, "did somebody squeak?"
Five of his seven posts in the last couple of pages didn’t contribute anything, absolutely nothing! That must be some kind of record, although not one to be proud of.
Whitespirit’s post is incredible because , after some silly comments of his own, he ends by suggesting my and newboy’s comments are of low quality. How hypocritical is that:
The usual bunch simply shout a lot , make no points to support their argument and then resort to name calling
So what does your ally (whom you didn't criticize) add to the debate by shouting racist, then posting insults and paragraph upon paragraph of waffle?
Isn't that exactly what you accused us of? Only difference with reindeer is that no one's laughing with him. But then again, you're both singing from the same hymn sheet, so he won't come in for criticism.
None of us have mentioned being clever.
Maybe it's just the low quality of yours and reindeers posts that give that impression.
Cajar suggests that all internet forums are the same.
Sorry to disagree, only those inhabited by those who cannot discuss the topic, without resort to offence and insults, are similar.
Norcon posts a comment loaded with his usual exaggerated and racist terms:
How do you fight 180 million radiacalized *******s with an ideology that has nothing in common with the west?
Well, norcon, how do you object to half a dozen radical fundamentalist racists?
Jockscott falls into the same trap as johnmelad and norcon thinking that there’s only an either/or position:
Thing is RNR tries his hardest to defend the indefensible (Muslim Extremism) , whilst maintaining the facade of defending a minority religious group.
He obviously hasn’t read my comment a couple of pages ago. Perhaps he should try to keep up.
JBR’s comment demonstrates that he must have put BBC news on ignore also.
Firstly, just about all the trouble we hear about these days is caused by Muslim extremists, whilst other religions never seem to feature. The protest marches with placards stating an intention to take over the world are all undertaken by Muslims. Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Sikhs and Hindus do not appear to do this.
Does he not remember the 1000’s of Palestinians killed recently (over the last several years) by Israelis? Not to mention the millions of Iraqis and Afghanistanis.
Muslims are on the receiving end of persecution and have been for several years, by christians and jews. Now that there are some fundamentalists retaliating it’s described as terrorism. Whereas the initital action against muslims (palestinians) was pure land-grab and re-location of the indigenous people. Or even worse, indiscriminate bombing.
One would think that Buddhists would have an acceptable reason to retalliate after the millions killed in the 60's early 70's.
He also forgets the conflicts in Si Lanka, Thailand, India/Pakistan etc.
So let's not kid ourselves that we have the moral high ground.
Squeaky adopts the guise of immigration to camouflage his racist views:
do YOU accept that just because someone has serious questions about immigration in this country, it doesn't mean that they are a 'racist?' If you can agree on that then there is room for a serious discussion.
Just like johnmelad tried to hide his racist opinions behind animal welfare and other causes.
I honestly believe that that the racists on this forum are simply that: racists, and they will use any pretext to preach their radical fundamentalism.
As johnmelad posts, he’s just simply islamophobic. I was going to quote him but I see his recent threads seem to have disappeared. I wonder why.
If immigration is a concern, then I and others, as they have demonstrated, are more than willing to engage in sensible dialogue. But sadly the members of the hyponoia gang compete amongst themselves to see who can be most racially offensive, all under the pretext of discussing immigration.
Invariably norcon is the undisputed champion of the most racially offensive.
Finally, the comment about me being insulting to racists. Why not? They are offensive and insulting people but when they are insulted they cry foul!
How childish is that.
