for example the kettle lead is rated 10A.
Why is this when the cable is often 1.5
The C13/C14 connectors are only rated for 10A.
If the load is ≤10A and the nature of the load is such that it is "unlikley to create an overload" (i.e. result in a current >10A, other than true, very high, 'fault' currents), I would not have thought that would be a requirement to have a 10A fuse, even if the connectors were only rated at 10A, provided the fuse fitted (e.g. 13A) was adequate to protect the cable (which it would be for any flex ≥1.25mm²), would there?
The C13/C14 connectors are only rated for 10A..
Thanks thats the only reason I could see. Seems odd to me why they are though.
As I've just written, I'm far from convinced that that, per se, is a reason for needing a 10A fuse. I also agree that it seems very odd/unlikley that they can't 'cope' with at least 13A!
You're all missing the point.
Yes - it does intuitively seem that a C13/14 or C15/16 pair could cope with 13A, but intuition (rightly, IMO) is not what standards are based on.
And the standard requires that it only be capable of carrying 10A. Since these leads will legitimately be sold to literally (original meaning, not the
recently approved hey-lets-give-in-to-the-ignorami-once-more one ) hundreds of millions of people who have no fuses in their plugs and who will legitimately use them on circuits protected by 16A breakers, there
cannot be a requirement for them to be fused at 10A.
But what there
must be is a requirement for them to not be used for a load
which in normal operation is more than 10A, hence the rating given by the makers. Who have no idea what their product will be used for when they make it - all they know is 230V±, 10A max, 70°C max conductor/contact temperature.
The move away from the use of "kettle connectors" for kettles to the use of powered bases on which they sit hasn't just had ease-of-use benefits - my kettle draws 12A (at U
0 ), so it boils faster, and thus wastes less power, than one limited to 10A.