Thanks for proving my point.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
- Thread starter JohnD
- Start date
Thanks for proving my point.
That's the point though. It's easy getting all moralistic when it's someone elses money, yet when it comes to them paying more than their fair share, which is what they expect of others, suddenly it's all closed ranks. Him employing an accountant and hiding tax money for the benefit of his children means he pays even less than his fair share. This is what I mean about hypocrisy.
Sorry Hawk, it did not say that you were to have the monopoly in the fun making stakes when I logged on. Keep out of the kitchen if you can't stand the heat Boyo.
Sorry Hawk, it did not say that you were to have the monopoly in the fun making stakes when I logged on. Keep out of the kitchen if you can't stand the heat Boyo.
There's no heat coming from you buddy just stupidity.
Eh? Where did you get this idea? Is lying something you have a propensity to do? I guess we can dismiss all your hard luck stories from previous posts then eh.
B
blightymam
I'm not sure what you mean about employing an accountant and it meaning he hides tax or pays less than fair share? When I had an accountant he never hid tax, the rules were the rules.
Take no notice of Hawk, he's had another bad nights sleep. Cat's been ill or summat.
Because these people wax sanctimoniously about the rich and taking money back from rich people but when they can they do exactly the same thing themselves, much like the animal farm analogy.
B
blightymam
But the rules are the rules aren't they? There's different tax bands, the rich pay more tax, very low income people don't pay tax and everyone if they've any sense doesn't pay more tax than they need to. I just don't understand your saying that employing an accountant makes a person pay less tax or break the rules!
I think you may need a better analogy.
B
blightymam
You're obsessed with that guy aren't ya?!
Not really. If it's the state that you believe in you'd be happy to pay as much as is sequestered from you without tax planning. Of course all socialists are like this, they say one thing and do something else. Just like how Blair got away pretending to care about the poor, and rather than help train poorer people into getting skills he allowed the country to open it's borders giving corporations instant access to migrant slave labour, meaning they don't have to fund education, created a third sub-class (benefits class) and when the money ran out all these people were left out in the cold. Noseall does this in his business, he employs the cheapest possible people, pays out the least he can, and maximises his own personal profits with tax planning. Everyone is doing this.
He's one well known example of a tax-dodging billionaire. Perhaps you don't care about sponging parasites.
Would you rather talk about tax-dodging multinationals?
If the spongers paid their way, the rest of us wouldn't need to pay so much, or our starved public services could deliver better public services
When you buy an Apple ithing, or a Starbucks coffee, or a book from Amazon, how much of the profit do you think rolls into UK Corporation tax?
Unlike the Tories who would never dream of back-tracking or performing U-turns mid campaign. You are a very silly, ill informed boy Hawk.
