Sorry, CO2, and Yeeesss, they do. Try this, and it's one of the newer ones.
your link does not seem to say how much CO2 all the world's ships produce per year, and how much all the world's cars.
Sorry, CO2, and Yeeesss, they do. Try this, and it's one of the newer ones.
Then why not provide the link?Just googled and first site says the worlds 15 biggest ships create more pollution than all the worlds 760 million cars???
Is it by any chance something that cars don't emit?
I don't know if they have an CATs fitted.
It isn't speculation if its based upon evidence. We have a theory. You could compare this with evolution, as it is also a theory, with an abundance of evidence (albiet a theory that has had many more years to be looked into). We have a whole heap of evidence supporting AGW, and the evidence against it has looked more and more flawed as a results. This is why people are saying "the debate is over". It sounds hyperbolic, but actually, the evidence is that slanted to AGW that there is less and less need to debate it.But although we have evidence, we are just really speculatinng on the meaning of that evidence.
As I said earlier, there are those even in the IPCC who do not believe in AGW. It isn't a closed shop.Reading start of that comment, I suspect we are fairly close in our thinking, but my contention is that if you only take the obvious and most shouted answer, then you close your mind to other possibilites. I have no problem going along with the reductions in CO2, but I think renewables aren't the answer, but they're being pushed becuase the debate has been shut down. And I agree completely and utterly with the end of your sentence, but because everyone has decided on what needs doing, those sort of strategies don't get the attention they need.
The debate is how do we prevent that, as that would be preferable, as it would reduce extinctions and mean less problems for people (like food production).The Earth will always recover, but whether the current species is here to see it, is another matter altogether. But that's another argument completely.