From a Belgian magazine, reproduced by the telegraph.
From a Belgian magazine, reproduced by the telegraph.
Small jobs I can price if Sent a photo(s). I consider myself expensive anyway. I know what sort of money I'm worth and want to earn in an hour/day.
But yes I do charge richer people more than I would someone without a pot to P! ss in.
There are so many people out there claiming to be a plumber and earning very well in relation to the crap they are producing. So I don't feel embarrassed about it.
But yes I do charge richer people more than I would someone without a pot to P! ss in.
.
What do you consider as expensive?
I pay the guy I trust usually £60 for the first hour and he's fast and efficient.
What do you consider as expensive?
I pay the guy I trust usually £60 for the first hour and he's fast and efficient.
From a Belgian magazine, reproduced by the telegraph.
Do you realise how many posts Bodd made denying and defending his racist comment about Belgian hooligans, and denying the thread existed, before he came up with the excuse that he was quoting from a magazine article?
25 posts before he invented his excuse. Not to mention two posts where he has deleted his comments, in this thread. Not to mention the numerous post he made in the now deleted thread. Only now he makes his excuses.
Even then someone else had to find a nine year old magazine article to fit the bill.
Strange that!
Is he a bit slow in explaining why he made a racist comment?
Notice also, that he claimed it was a Belgian magazine. The nine year old article that birgadier found was an English article.
From a Belgian magazine, reproduced by the telegraph.
You both (and eeyore) are making up one lie after another to cover your asses, And to make the original lies look credible.Your off your rocker.. You rumble on boring us all, knowing no-one is really going to sith through your made up evidence in the hope they believe you.
For a start, Bodd made the racist comment against Belgians before 6th August. I know because I referred to it on 6th August. Note the date on the bottom of the
Obviously not. Your comment was in a thread that appeared before 6th August. And you made your comment before 6th August.So I copied number 10 on the list before the thread was even started.
Was it in the thread?But I posted it on the thread about the article from a thread about a Belgium magazine.
Whereas the article found by brigadier in the Telegraph was dated 23rd August, well after Bodd's racist comment:
Why make 25 comments in this thread, denying the thread or the comment existed, before coming up with your excuse?
You really are a royal pee narsYou both (and eeyore) are making up one lie after another to cover your asses, And to make the original lies look credible.
But your claims simply do not stack up.
For a start, Bodd made the racist comment against Belgians before 6th August. I know because I referred to it on 6th August. Note the date on the bottom of the quote.
Read more: https://www.diynot.com/diy/threads/child-seperation.506781/page-3#ixzz5PCvmbB9H
View attachment 147283
Whereas the article found by brigadier in the Telegraph was dated 23rd August, well after Bodd's racist comment:
View attachment 147285
Bodd claimed to be quoting from a Belgian magazine, the original printed nine years ago, not from the Telegraph.
Does Bodd seriously expect us to believe that he was quoting from the original article, that was printed nine years ago, yet he could not provide links to his source, and still has not provided links to his source.
Let us not forget, Bodd has form for being dishonest and deceitful.
Now it appears he has the support of eeyore and brigadier in his deceit.
I care not a jot if no-one bothers to read the overwhelming evidence that Bodd (now with the support of brigadier and eeyore, and we all know eeyore's form) is a deceitful person. He has demonstrated that he will exploit the opportunity to use racist expressions whenever the opportunity presents itself.
The evidence is there (until it is deleted but this time I will have a copy) to refer to the next time Bodd is found to be dishonest. And there will be a next time, there always is with dishonest people.
You three (bodd, brigadier and eeyore) can rant and moan as much as you like, the evidence is there in black and white, as are your lies.
Obviously not. Your comment was in a thread that appeared before 6th August. And you made your comment before 6th August.
Was it in the thread?
Certainly the Telegraph article was not, it had not been printed.
Was the nine year old article from a Belgian magazine in the thread?
(Yes we know eeyore and brigadier will have seen it, they will claim they seen it even if they did not.)
Why would anyone start a thread based on a nine year old Belgian magazine article?
Why did you not say you were repeating a comment from an article, in that thread, when you were challenged about your comment?
You could have easily referred everyone to the article!
Instead you claimed you were referring to Liverpool fans, even though your comment was obviously aimed at Belgian hooligans.
There was no mention then of a magazine article.
Why make 25 comments in this thread, denying the thread or the comment existed, before coming up with your excuse?
It just does not stack up!
It did not then, and it still does not.