Statelessness

[jasonzyx]

I suspect there is a world of difference between 'automatically being entitled to' and 'having'.
That automatic entitlement can be rescinded. That would not render someone stateless it would merely prevent them from claiming citizenship.
To strip someone of their already obtained citizenship would be, in this instance, render the person stateless.

The current act of rescinding citizenship is in direct contrast to the Home Office policy published last year, strangely enough citing the very same typical example.

 

[EddieM]

You can be stripped of your birth citizenship if you are entitled to citizenship elsewhere, this is what has happened.

 

[durhamplumber]

Send her to live with BAS...She will be walking back to Syria by end of the week

 

[jasonzyx]

You can be stripped of your birth citizenship if you are entitled to citizenship elsewhere, this is what has happened.

You may be correct, but there is a difference between being entitled to, and having.
If I am entitled to something, it can be rescinded, that does not affect my status quo.
If I have something, and it is rescinded, that does affect my status quo.
Thus, in any appeal, I suspect that the teenager will win easily if Bangladesh refuses her citizenship.

 

[durhamplumber]

If I am entitled to something, it can be rescinded, that does not affect my status quo.
If I have something, and it is rescinded, that does affect my status quo.

Are you a Sir Gal clone..he dances around on head of a pin excessively too.

 

[durhamplumber]

Thus, in any appeal, I suspect that the teenager will win easily if Bangladesh refuses her citizenship.

Change laws if need be and leave her out there,stateless to rot.

 

[^woody^]

Perhaps the interviewee asked her to?

You're missing the point. Her religion says that she can't show her mush to anyone. Can't do, not allowed, against sharia.

And yet there is was on TV at tea-time.

 

[ellal]

Her religion says that she can't show her mush to anyone.

Your ignorance never fails to amaze!

Not a requirement, and the idea was actually from a pre-islamic era

 

[sodthisforfun]

You're missing the point. Her religion says that she can't show her mush to anyone. Can't do, not allowed, against sharia.

And yet there is was on TV at tea-time.

I wonder if it's because she's appealing and trying to appeal to the British gov/people?

Your ignorance never fails to amaze!

Not a requirement, and the Niqab was actually from a pre-islamic era

I think you'll find that IS were insistent on women covering up. Remember the fab video of burning the burqa?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ving-beards-terrorism-terrorist-a7854431.html

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/17/isis-orders-women-iraq-syria-veils-gloves

 

[^woody^]

Your ignorance never fails to amaze!

Not a requirement, and the idea was actually from a pre-islamic era

I know Islam is still stuck in the dark ages, despite it being 2019.

But those that wear the letterbox, and those that insist their subjugated wives wear it, do it so that no one can see their faces. Where does the koran say its OK to show your face to 50 milion people on TV, but not the bloke next door?

 

[durhamplumber]

Where does the koran say its OK to show your face to 50 milion people on TV, but not the bloke next door?

That is a very good point dude!

 

[ellal]

How does that differ, for any other nation?

Nations have different policies...

Some do not allow dual citizenship and some put on provisos...
Others have changed the rules over time

Which brings up another anomaly...

There are EU citizens who have had to give up their citizenship of birth in order to take up UK citizenship.
Thus some (ex) EU citizens couldn't have their UK citizenship removed whilst others can have it removed dependant on country or date of birth...

All that this goes to prove is that as soon as you are registered at birth, you are then enslaved to a state as regards how you are and are not allowed to live.
And of course that is also dependant on the ever changing nature of those making the rules!

 

[ellal]

Where does the koran say its OK to show your face to 50 milion people on TV, but not the bloke next door?

Where does the koran say you can't show your face to 'the bloke next door'?

 

[^woody^]

Where does the koran say you can't show your face to 'the bloke next door'?

That is my point.

Why is she wearing that shroud?

 

[motorbiking]

Has Dork said something that is not true? Feel free to give your own opinion rather than whinge.

That she has committed no crime? I'm not convinced - here's one to start the list off with.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/11/section/11

Correct.
Javid is just appealing to voters.

Experts disagree with you.