Statelessness

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
On the TV interview, she came in from outside wearing that letterbox thing, presumably to hide her face from people like a good jihadist does, and then lifted the thing so that millions of people could see that mug.

Can someone explain the logic in that?

Just wants to go home innit.


I've heard that before as it goes.
 
Isis is to Islam what the Ku Klux Klan is to Christianity. She is guilty of nothing more than being a belligerent teenager whose brain is not yet fully developed.

The real crime is that the moderates stand by & allow the extremists to brainwash their young & gullible.
 
Sponsored Links
Has Dork said something that is not true? Feel free to give your own opinion rather than whinge.

Did I say he had? No.

The style of writing and unnecessary insults were very reminiscent of BAS.

Also, I'm not sure how an opinion and 'whining' differs because neither have to be factual, A view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.
 
The way UK citizenship can be removed, and indeed the way the decision to award/deny a UK passport is interpreted is bizarre...

You could be refused a passport for having a minor unspent conviction - for example something like a £200 fine for not disposing of hair correctly!

Someone who has spent their entire life in the UK, but has dual nationality via their parents (thus through no 'fault' of their own) can in theory have their UK citizenship stripped for a trivial offence because they will not be stateless...
Whereas commit a murder but have no other nationality (or claim not to have), and you stay...

It will be interesting to see what happens after Brexit for EU citizens with dual nationality, and how fairly/unfairly the rules will be applied.

One suspects that it will depend on 'trial by media' or the prevailing political climate - not due judicial process!
 
The way UK citizenship can be removed..................................................... is bizarre...



Someone who has spent their entire life in the UK, but has dual nationality via their parents (thus through no 'fault' of their own) can in theory have their UK citizenship stripped for a trivial offence because they will not be stateless...
Whereas commit a murder but have no other nationality (or claim not to have), and you stay...

How does that differ, for any other nation?
 
Correct.
Javid is just appealing to voters.


Seemingly incorrect (in part) she automatically has/had dual citizenship until 21, she now doesn't, so argue as much as you like, seemingly the way in works is that Bangladesh would be the ones guilty of making her stateless if they refuse to take her.

Javid appealing to voters.... that bit is sort of correct, he is appealing to wider public opinion though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top