If what you says has any realistic prospect of being true (it doesn't), why do we go to so much trouble in the UK and EU alike to arm ourselves at a governental level to protect from foreign nations attacking us and inevitably telling us what to do?
When the Novichok attacks happened for example, on the lead up to that we were constantly hearing about 'Russian Meddling'. Are they a different type of foreigner that aren't included in the imaginary EU exemption of not wanting to tell other nations what to do?
For once you're aboslutely right, because it's an absurd concept to think no other nation, inside of the EU or outside of it would never in future want to do harm or dictate to others.
You have no real evidence to say the way in which someone voted was due to to any "fear/dislike/hate", just a perpetuated presumpution based on immigration concerns but to suggest you shoudn't have a genuine concern (not as you put it "fear/dislike/hate") for others wanting to to harm to your own nation is stupid and we could save a fortune on Trident if what you're saying had any credibility.
You're just trying to pin the xenophobia idea to any old donkey using whatever method possible.