Nope, those are all the implications and the reality of a no-deal Brexit!
Aww bless...
You really don't get it do you!
The idiots are calling Boris a tin pot dictator yet they are trying to stop the referdum outcome !
- Thread starter gasbanni
- Start date
- Status
Aww bless...
You really don't get it do you!
Sponsored Links
you are holding the crystal ball -you have no knowledge and you happily admit to having no interest in learning.
You said knowledge and facts were boring.
Pariah state status beckons...
Do you think we might even be added to 'axis of evil' if we refuse to open up the NHS to the US?
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,424
- Reaction score
- 540
- Country
Socialist Scum for not wanting our NHS to turn into the debt ridden expensive and horrible US healthcare system which every Western democracy has rejected.
Sponsored Links
Nope.
youve had 3 years to learn and understand Brexit, but you havent.
So you cant understand why it is not deliverable in any positive way.
So you get angry and blame the wrong people.
Thats what happens with ignorance.
I keep telling these Brexiteers, no deal is not a win in any way.
it just means going back to the Eu to negotiate a deal.
Can you tell me why they dont understand -do they have no understanding of the importance of frictionless trade to UK business.
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,424
- Reaction score
- 540
- Country
It's not about trade, for many its about bendy bananas, immigration, EU telling us what to do etc.
Why do you ask them about trade when they don't even know the first thing about how the economy works.
Well if you stretch your mind back to referendum day, then you could probably answer that question better than me
But I would put it down to ignorance and not caring...
Both relating to many of them wishing to kick out at somebody because of their legitimate gripes - they just kicked out at the wrong target!
(The EU, not their own government)
But both can also be put down to a deep seated misplaced xenophobia, because many believed 'johnny/jane foreigner' were to blame...
Because all the research shows that immigration was the number one issue!
D
durhamplumber
What a berk..weirdest bit is, you seriously believe that guff.
D
durhamplumber
Had a ref...carry out the decision..sorted.democracy
D
durhamplumber
Wrong.
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,424
- Reaction score
- 540
- Country
Explain.
D
durhamplumber
Can always tell they are wrong,they re-boot the patronising sht.
“Clearly mad”: What Cabinet ministers have said in the past about suspending Parliament
August 28, 2019
By Sam Bright
Westminster is ablaze with the news that Boris Johnson intends to shut down Parliament in the run up to Brexit, preventing MPs from introducing legislation to block no deal.
This idea, of ‘proroguing’ Parliament to force through a hard Brexit, was pitched by now Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab during the recent Conservative leadership contest – generating some strong views within the party.
Here’s what some of Boris Johnson’s current Cabinet had to say about the idea at the time.
Matt Hancock, Health Secretary
“This idea from some people that to deliver Brexit we should suspend our parliamentary democracy, that we should prorogue Parliament, that goes against everything those men wading onto those beaches [during WW2] fought and died for.”
Amber Rudd, Work and Pensions Secretary
“I think it’s outrageous to consider proroguing parliament. We are not Stuart kings.”
Sajid Javid, Chancellor of the Exchequer
“You don’t deliver democracy by trashing our democracy”.
Michael Gove, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
“I don’t think that’s the right thing to do. We live in a parliamentary democracy. Parliament must vote in order to ensure we leave the EU.
“Proroguing parliament in order to try to get no-deal through, I think, would be wrong for many reasons.
“It would not be true to the best traditions of British democracy.”
Nicky Morgan, Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Secretary
“Proroguing Parliament is clearly a mad suggestion.
“You cannot say you are going to take back control… and then go: ‘Oh by the way we are just going to shut Parliament down for a couple of months, so we are just going to drift out on a no-deal.'”
Link sources, see https://scramnews.com/what-cabinet-ministers-have-said-about-suspending-proroguing-parliament/
August 28, 2019
By Sam Bright
Westminster is ablaze with the news that Boris Johnson intends to shut down Parliament in the run up to Brexit, preventing MPs from introducing legislation to block no deal.
This idea, of ‘proroguing’ Parliament to force through a hard Brexit, was pitched by now Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab during the recent Conservative leadership contest – generating some strong views within the party.
Here’s what some of Boris Johnson’s current Cabinet had to say about the idea at the time.
Matt Hancock, Health Secretary
“This idea from some people that to deliver Brexit we should suspend our parliamentary democracy, that we should prorogue Parliament, that goes against everything those men wading onto those beaches [during WW2] fought and died for.”
Amber Rudd, Work and Pensions Secretary
“I think it’s outrageous to consider proroguing parliament. We are not Stuart kings.”
Sajid Javid, Chancellor of the Exchequer
“You don’t deliver democracy by trashing our democracy”.
Michael Gove, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
“I don’t think that’s the right thing to do. We live in a parliamentary democracy. Parliament must vote in order to ensure we leave the EU.
“Proroguing parliament in order to try to get no-deal through, I think, would be wrong for many reasons.
“It would not be true to the best traditions of British democracy.”
Nicky Morgan, Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Secretary
“Proroguing Parliament is clearly a mad suggestion.
“You cannot say you are going to take back control… and then go: ‘Oh by the way we are just going to shut Parliament down for a couple of months, so we are just going to drift out on a no-deal.'”
Link sources, see https://scramnews.com/what-cabinet-ministers-have-said-about-suspending-proroguing-parliament/
Yes, but they say it was not done for that reason.
It really is not good enough.
Trumpland is here (there).
It really is not good enough.
Trumpland is here (there).
- Status
Sponsored Links
