So, another lockdown.

They chose to include the scary line despite it not being valid anymore to help sell things. Classic Boris.
 
They chose to include the scary line despite it not being valid anymore to help sell things. Classic Boris.

whitty and vallance included the scary line.
The same pair that you are happy to kowtow along with.
Had fek all to do with BJ.

The two medical stooges are preparing for the inquiry and only interested in saving their own arzes.
Already they are stuttering and seat shifting when questioned.
 
Last edited:
To be fair, didn't Vinty just say "immunity either exists or it doesn't" which must be true?

Thats exactly what he said.
But as usual the scamdemic nutters choose to interpret the post in their own twisted fashion.
 
Last edited:
Is this the one where the nurse didn't have the relevant power of attorney and so was technically abducting her mother?

If so, a sad and a depressing example of why everyone should have living wills and powers of attorney drawn up just in case.
 
Vinty's article say "the first in the world" meaning nobody else supports the claim

It also says it has not been peer-reviewed meaning it is not fit to be published in an authoritative journal.

It may or may not be confirmed, and is described as "promising"

It's great, and unsurprising, news that a previously-infected survivor has some level of resistance for some period. This however does not mean that it will be beneficial to allow the disease to rampage through the population, with hundreds of thousands of victims at any one time.

The article says "Other research has shown that antibody levels often decline quickly after Covid-19 patients have recovered" and "In contrast, antibody levels in some people had dwindled to undetectable levels within six months." Perhaps those are the parts vinty wanted to draw to our attention.

It's sweet to see Vinty has been able to find one newspaper article with some, but not all, of the content that he likes.

Vinty incorrectly believes that immunity resistance can be only 100% or 0%

He uses the word "level" but does not know what it means.

He avoids consideration of "new variants" of disease.
There is more to immunity than just anti bodies.
By the way at least 47 million people have contracted Coronavirus, what are the statistics for deaths due to a second infection of Covid.
I got this text today from the NHS.

Dear Mark Vincent,
UK Blood Services are collecting plasma from people who have had a positive test for COVID-19. 28 days after recovery from COVID-19, you could save lives by donating plasma. For further information and to see if you can help others with COVID-19, please visit www.nhs.uk/coronavirus and click the take part in research section.
If immunity is a myth why would the NHS want me to donate Plasma.
 
There is more to immunity than just anti bodies.
By the way at least 47 million people have contracted Coronavirus, what are the statistics for deaths due to a second infection of Covid.
I got this text today from the NHS.

Dear Mark Vincent,
UK Blood Services are collecting plasma from people who have had a positive test for COVID-19. 28 days after recovery from COVID-19, you could save lives by donating plasma. For further information and to see if you can help others with COVID-19, please visit www.nhs.uk/coronavirus and click the take part in research section.
If immunity is a myth why would the NHS want me to donate Plasma.

None of which proves immunity timescale nor gives any credibility that there is any other way to deal with Covid than current policy.

Naturally acquired Herd immunity not a solution, never has been, never will be.
 
None of which proves immunity timescale nor gives any credibility that there is any other way to deal with Covid than current policy.

Naturally acquired Herd immunity not a solution, never has been, never will be.
Do you believe that people who have recovered from coronavirus are at the same risk of infection than people who have never been infected with coronavirus.
 
Can we stop saying immunity?

What we're discussing is protection, which can be complete, in which case you can say you're immune, or partial where you might catch something again but it's less likely or likely to be weaker the second time around.

It's highly likely that recovering from Covid-19 gives you some protection against future infection of the same strain, but there's little evidence that it protects you from other strains as it's been proven that you can catch two.
 
I see that in the Lancet article vinty mentioned, it says the person who was infected twice was much more ill the second time, and the strain was a different one

so his immunity didn't do him much good.

I wonder what the point was, that vinty hoped to make.
One case out of millions proves nothing.
Has the Lancets article been peer reviewed.
Anecdotal stories in magazines are just clickbait for the superstitious and gullible.
 
Back
Top