• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

'Vaccine' shortage...

Status
Not open for further replies.
What happens if those who 'need' a second jab don't get it because it isn't available?

Depending on who you believe the time period between the two affects the outcome...

So to cut a long story short it's a total b*lls up!

And the 'jabbers' have the temerity to condemn those who would prefer to wait and see!
 
India now have a production problem and the scheduled delivery of 10 million more doses to UK have been halved to 5 million.
The CEO of SII (the indian company making the vaccine) says that the delay is down to the Indian government preventing further exports of the vaccine at the moment.
 
What happens if those who 'need' a second jab don't get it because it isn't available?

Depending on who you believe the time period between the two affects the outcome...

So to cut a long story short it's a total b*lls up!

And the 'jabbers' have the temerity to condemn those who would prefer to wait and see!
Considering we have managed to vaccinate 25 million people so far, and a further 2 million with their second jab, i think that you'd struggle to justify calling the current arrangements a balls up.

Our strategy of sourcing vaccines from where ever we've been able to and extending the period between first and second doses to get more people with a level of protection (even if not the full protection) has paid off. Look at how far we are ahead of most of the rest of the world and how far deaths and hospitalisations have dropped.

I genuinely worry about the EU countries. They're starting to see yet another wave with associated lockdowns, with no real hope of immunity allowing them to end those lockdowns anytime soon because they are not managing to get people vaccinated. Its already financially crippling, but for them its going to get even worse.
 
Those who complain tat the EU has the power to ban exports of vaccine and how "undemocratic" such a law is should be aware that similar laws could be enacted under UK law.
Most governments have similar regulations built in.
"The export intervention, if deemed necessary, would follow a similar legal logic: it would be limited to there being a domestic shortage of supply and only cover doses intended for the U.K. market. That would include the 100 million doses according to the timeline agreed by the British government and AstraZeneca and similar provisions with other vaccine makers.

Such a step also wouldn’t be against either domestic law or international trade rules, and could be exercised by emergency powers to requisition goods under the Civil Contingencies Act. In practice, the enforcement of a temporary requisition order would likely fall to multiple departments, including the Cabinet Office, DHSC, and the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.

This step would also be sanctioned by health care provisions in international trade law. Restricting exports would be allowed under public health and national security exemptions detailed in Article 20 and 21 of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, a foundation of international trade law that the EU and U.K. are party to.

Asked if ministers had sought legal advice on export restrictions, a British government spokesperson declined to comment. In a statement, they said that the vaccine rollout was on target. “We are in constant contact with the vaccine manufacturers and remain confident that the supply of vaccine to the U.K. will not be disrupted,” the spokesperson said. "

politico
 
Those who complain tat the EU has the power to ban exports of vaccine and how "undemocratic" such a law is should be aware that similar laws could be enacted under UK law.
Having the powers and how you use them are completely different.

The EU's basis for restricting supply is
"You have vaccinated more than us, because you did better planning and procurement, so you can't have any more of your vaccine that you financed and helped develop, because that would put you even further ahead than us. Oh, and it does not matter that we have actually stopped using your vaccine either, we'll still just keep it anyway just to stop you getting it"
 
Politics in the EU seem to have a higher priority than saving lives.

 
Politics in the EU seem to have a higher priority than saving lives.

Not sure you are correct. Have you watched the clip you provided?

Your clip says that 10million doses have been sent from EU to UK; and UK has been able to vaccinate about 25million people (thanks, EU, we appreciate your help). UK has not exported any. Do you foresee this pattern continuing?

UK has now vaccinated the vast majority of its vulnerable population, and is (was) planning to blitz the low-risk and younger people. Do you think EU countries should send doses to UK that could be used for more vulnerable people in their own countries? Would that save more lives? Or fewer?
 
Not sure you are correct. Have you watched the clip you provided?

Your clip says that 10million doses have been sent from EU to UK; and UK has been able to vaccinate about 25million people (thanks, EU, we appreciate your help). UK has not exported any. Do you foresee this pattern continuing?
What is the point of the UK sending vaccines to the EU if the vaccines don't get used.
It seems the EUs actions are political.
 
What is the point of the UK sending vaccines to the EU if the vaccines don't get used.

Since the UK does not send vaccines, but does take them, this question does not arise.
 
The CEO of SII (the indian company making the vaccine) says that the delay is down to the Indian government preventing further exports of the vaccine at the moment.
Good...

They are maybe now thinking about prioritising their own citizens instead of the profits!

Blinkered vaxxers are no doubt going to bleat about how unfair it is, but guess what...

The pendulum swings both ways, and a small country like the UK will in the end reap what it sowed!
 
They are maybe now thinking about prioritising their own citizens

A perfectly understandable view by the Indian government.

USA and Britain do exactly the same.

I wonder if @Vinty agrees with this approach?
 
Good...

They are maybe now thinking about prioritising their own citizens instead of the profits!

Blinkered vaxxers are no doubt going to bleat about how unfair it is, but guess what...

The pendulum swings both ways, and a small country like the UK will in the end reap what it sowed!
You seem pleased that the UK, our country, is going to have its vaccine programme slowed.

That means more of our friends and neighbours will die.

Do you see that as a good thing?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top