We will of course accept that site as accurate and genuine.
We will of course accept that site as accurate and genuine.
Did the current SAGE say there were 2.3% of all tests were false positives or not?
Who has said that?I am, as you all well know, incredibly stupid. So could someone please explain to me how a test with only 2x possible outcomes could ever be judged at only 2% accurate?
Who has said that?
I can't remember, 'cos I am as I think I pointed out, incredibly stupid.
Forgive my stupidity, but I always thought that any test with only 2x possible outcomes could only ever hover around 50% if it is indeed inaccurate.
It's a bit like saying "we're going to toss a coin & if it heads it postive, if it tails it negative".
Unless I'm being far more stupider than my usual self, then I want to be tested by the test that shows the inaccurate test to be inaccurate.
Surely that test is the accurate one?
Tests can come back inconclusive.
What if the coin landed on its edge?
The stupid ones are those who believe in anything they are told about 'accuracy' and 'death figures'!Unless I'm being far more stupider than my usual self, then I want to be tested by the test that shows the inaccurate test to be inaccurate.
Or a little bit pregnant?I'm just a little upset, that those of us who pay tax, are paying for something which may as well tell us all we're pregnant.
The Department of Health's daily death figure includes anyone who dies of any cause within 28 days of a positive test, meaning patients who succumb to cancer, suffer a heart attack or get hit by a car within four weeks would be counted.
the stupid ones are the people who havent had the vaccine.The stupid ones are those who believe in anything they are told about 'accuracy' and 'death figures'!
its a big money spinner for those connected to testing labs...ie Tory matesI'm just a little upset, that those of us who pay tax, are paying for something which may as well tell us all we're pregnant.
its a big money spinner for those connected to testing labs...ie Tory mates
The same ONS that this professor has just said has “exaggerated the statistics “The ONS already provide the data showing how many died of other causes.
we all know the methodology for the 28 days is used to enable a quick return of daily death counts -it doesnt mean its invalid or proves covid isnt real.
dont you get bored of posting something thats been thoroughly debunked